China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Can Foreign Judgments Be Enforced in China? - CTD 101 Series

Fri, 19 Nov 2021
Categories: Insights
Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

avatar

China has now undertaken moves to liberalize rules on recognizing and enforcing foreign judgments, so as to better adapt to the trend of market opening.

Nevertheless, there are still only a few countries’ judgments that can be recognized and enforced in China. The following list in this article already includes major countries that have large-scale trade with China.

This post was first published in CJO GLOBAL, which is committed to providing consulting services in China-related cross-border trade risk management and debt collection.

As of June 8, 2021, we have collected 72 cases on Recognition of Foreign Judgments involving China and 24 foreign countries and regions. We think this should be the most complete data on this issue in the world. For more information about these cases, you can read our article “List of China’s Cases on Recognition of Foreign Judgments”.

Among them, there are 47 cases where recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments were applied for in Chinese courts.

In terms of the results:

  • In 18 cases, Chinese courts agreed to recognize foreign judgments;
  • In 24 cases, Chinese courts refused to recognize foreign judgments; and
  • In 5 cases, the application was withdrawn or dismissed by Chinese Courts.

To date, foreign judgments rendered from the following countries and regions in Group 1, 2, 3 can or are likely to be recognized and enforced in China. From Groups 1 to 3, the possibility gradually decreases.

In other countries and regions not listed in Groups 1 to 3, there is not enough evidence to show that their judgments may be recognized and enforced by Chinese courts. We listed them in Group 4.

For more information about the time and expenses, you may read our post Time and Expenses – Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in China.

Group 1

These countries have concluded bilateral treaties on the recognition and enforcement of judgments with China.

Therefore, as long as the judgments of these countries meet the requirements provided in the treaty, they would be enforced by the Chinese courts.

These countries include:

  1. Algeria;
  2. Argentina;
  3. Belarus;
  4. Bosnia;
  5. Brazil;
  6. Bulgaria;
  7. Cuba;
  8. Cyprus;
  9. Egypt;
  10. France;
  11. Greece;
  12. Herzegovina
  13. Hungary;
  14. Italy;
  15. Kazakhstan;
  16. Kyrgyzstan;
  17. Kuwait;
  18. Laos;
  19. Lithuania;
  20. Mongolia;
  21. Morocco;
  22. North Korea;
  23. Peru;
  24. Poland;
  25. Romania;
  26. Russia;
  27. Spain;
  28. Tajikistan;
  29. Tunisia;
  30. Turkey;
  31. Ukraine;
  32. UAE;
  33. Uzbekistan; and
  34. Vietnam.

For more information about these bilateral treaties, you can read our article “List of China’s Bilateral Treaties on Judicial Assistance in Civil and Commercial Matters (Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Included)”.

Group 2

The judgments rendered in these countries have already been recognized in China based on reciprocity.

Therefore, we believe that their judgments will continue to be enforced by Chinese courts with a high probability in the future.

These countries include:

  1. Germany;
  2. Singapore;
  3. South Korea; and
  4. USA.

Group 3

These countries and regions have recognized Chinese judgments and are waiting for China to confirm the reciprocity in future cases.

We believe that their judgments are also likely to be enforced by Chinese courts. However, as there is no precedent, there is still a certain degree of uncertainty.

These countries include:

  1. Australia;
  2. British Virgin Islands;
  3. Canada;
  4. Netherlands;
  5. New Zealand; and
  6. UK (to be confirmed).

Group 4

We are not certain that judgments in countries and regions other than those in Groups 1 to 3 can be enforced by Chinese courts.

 

 

 

The Cross-border Trade Dispute 101 Series (‘CTD 101 Series’) provides an introduction to China-related cross-border trade dispute, and covers the knowledge essential to cross-border trade dispute resolution and debt collection.

* * *

Do you need support in cross-border trade and debt collection?

CJO Global's team can provide you with China-related cross-border trade risk management and debt collection services, including: 
(1) Trade Dispute Resolution
(2) Debt Collection
(3) Judgments and Awards Collection
(4) Anti-Counterfeiting & IP Protection
(5) Company Verification and Due Diligence
(6) Trade Contract Drafting and Review

If you need our services, or if you wish to share your story, you can contact our Client Manager Susan Li (susan.li@yuanddu.com).

If you want to know more about CJO Global, please click here.

If you want to know more about CJO Global services, please click here.

If you wish to read more CJO Global posts, please click here.

 

Original Links: Can Foreign Judgments Be Enforced in China?

 

Photo by Ben White on Unsplash

Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

Save as PDF

You might also like

Authenticating Documents for Use in Chinese Courts: Apostille or Not?

The 1961 Apostille Convention, effective in China as of November 2023, simplifies the authentication of foreign documents for use in Chinese courts by replacing traditional consular legalization with apostille. Note that authentication is only required for certain types of documents under Chinese law, and the apostille process applies only when the 1961 Convention is relevant.

Chinese Court Refuses to Recognize Russian Judgment Due to Due Process

In 2020, a local Chinese court in Beijing ruled against the recognition and enforcement of a Russian monetary judgment on the grounds that the party in absentia had not been properly summoned (the case of Chepetsky Mechanical Plant Joint-Stock Company (2020) Jing 04 Xie Wai Ren No. 2).

First Thai Monetary Judgment Enforced in China, Highlighting Presumptive Reciprocity in China-ASEAN Region

In 2024, a local Chinese court in Nanning, Guangxi, ruled to recognize and enforce a Thai monetary judgment. Apart from being the first case of enforcing Thai monetary judgments in China, it is also the first publicly reported case confirming a reciprocal relationship based on “presumptive reciprocity” (Guangxi Nanning China Travel Service Co., Ltd. v. Orient Thai Airlines Co., Ltd. (2023) Gui 71 Xie Wai Ren No. 1).