China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s Record CNY 100M Judgment in Landmark Trademark Battle: 'Xin Pan Pan' Loses to PANPAN

Tue, 21 Nov 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

The case involves a trademark infringement and unfair competition dispute against PANPAN, a well-known security door brand in China.

On 31 Aug. 2023, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) rendered a final judgment in the case, upholding the original judgment and ordering the infringing party to compensate the trademark owner up to CNY 100 million (See (2022) Zui Gao Fa Min Zhong No.209 ((2022)最高法民终209号)).

The plaintiff of the first instance is PANPAN Anju Door Industry Co., Ltd (盼盼安居门业有限责任公司, hereinafter the “PANPAN”), known to Chinese consumers for its products bearing the “PANPAN” wordmark and a panda logo.

Founded in 1992, PANPAN is China’s largest manufacturer of security doors. In 2010, PANPAN officially joined the well-known multinational corporation AssaAbloy of Sweden, the world’s largest supplier of smart locks and security solutions.

The defendant company was named “Xin Pan Pan” (鑫盼盼), and its trademark also featured a panda image.

PANPAN argued that “Xin Pan Pan” caused consumers confusion and engaged in commercial defamation, and filed a lawsuit with a court accordingly.

This case represents the latest advance in China’s recent efforts to impose higher costs on intellectual property infringers.

 

 

Photo by Stefan Wagener on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC Releases Typical Cases to Support Hong Kong Arbitration

In September 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released six typical cases to demonstrate its support for Hong Kong arbitration, emphasizing judicial cooperation and the recognition of arbitral awards to foster international arbitration development.

SPC Sets Standards for Punitive Damages in Food Safety

In August 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued a judicial interpretation that addresses punitive damages in food safety cases, featuring typical cases to establish uniform standards and enhance consumer protection.

Authenticating Documents for Use in Chinese Courts: Apostille or Not?

The 1961 Apostille Convention, effective in China as of November 2023, simplifies the authentication of foreign documents for use in Chinese courts by replacing traditional consular legalization with apostille. Note that authentication is only required for certain types of documents under Chinese law, and the apostille process applies only when the 1961 Convention is relevant.

SPP Releases 2024 Mid-Year Case Data

In the first half of 2024, China's Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) reported significant increases in arrests and prosecutions, as well as a notable rise in retrials based on their recommendations in civil cases.

China Intensifies Crackdown on Cross-Border Telecom Fraud

In July 2024, China's Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP), Supreme People’s Court (SPC), and the Ministry of Public Security released ten typical cases to highlight their intensified efforts to combat cross-border telecom and online fraud, emphasizing organized crime and emerging technologies.