China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Requires Full Coverage of Lawyer's Defense in Criminal Cases

Wed, 23 Nov 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

Full coverage of lawyer’s defense in criminal cases means that the government and the judicial authorities must ensure that criminal suspects have their own lawyers from the point on which they are allowed by the law to entrust defense lawyers.

On 12 Oct. 2012, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC), the Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP), the Ministry of Public Security, and the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) issued the “Opinions on Further Deepening the Pilot Program of Full Coverage of Lawyer’s Defense in Criminal Cases” (hereinafter the “Opinions”, 关于进一步深化刑事案件律师辩护全覆盖试点工作的意见).

The Opinions stipulates that the government and judicial authorities must provide defense lawyers for the criminal suspects without lawyers immediately during the period of examination and prosecution by procuratorates.

Criminal proceedings in China include three stages: the investigation stage by public security organs, the examination and prosecution stage by procuratorates, and the trial stage by courts.

In October 2017 and December 2018, the SPC and the MOJ respectively issued policies to provide lawyers for defendants without lawyers at the trial stage.

This policy further proposes that procuratorates should also provide lawyers for the criminal suspects at the stage of examination and prosecution.

The lawyers provided by the government and judicial authorities are mainly those designated by legal aid agencies and duty lawyers stationed at judicial authorities.

 

 

Cover Photo by ce xu on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC Releases Typical Cases to Support Hong Kong Arbitration

In September 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released six typical cases to demonstrate its support for Hong Kong arbitration, emphasizing judicial cooperation and the recognition of arbitral awards to foster international arbitration development.

SPC Sets Standards for Punitive Damages in Food Safety

In August 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued a judicial interpretation that addresses punitive damages in food safety cases, featuring typical cases to establish uniform standards and enhance consumer protection.

Authenticating Documents for Use in Chinese Courts: Apostille or Not?

The 1961 Apostille Convention, effective in China as of November 2023, simplifies the authentication of foreign documents for use in Chinese courts by replacing traditional consular legalization with apostille. Note that authentication is only required for certain types of documents under Chinese law, and the apostille process applies only when the 1961 Convention is relevant.

SPP Releases 2024 Mid-Year Case Data

In the first half of 2024, China's Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) reported significant increases in arrests and prosecutions, as well as a notable rise in retrials based on their recommendations in civil cases.

China Intensifies Crackdown on Cross-Border Telecom Fraud

In July 2024, China's Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP), Supreme People’s Court (SPC), and the Ministry of Public Security released ten typical cases to highlight their intensified efforts to combat cross-border telecom and online fraud, emphasizing organized crime and emerging technologies.

China's Clean Energy Progress Report (2024)

China's 2024 white paper titled “China’s Energy Transition” shows clean energy now makes up 58.2% of installed power capacity, with wind and solar increasing tenfold over a decade, and clean energy consumption rising from 15.5% to 26.4% of total energy use.

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Foreign Law Ascertainment

In July 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued its first batch of typical cases to illustrate the application of foreign laws, aiming to enhance the judiciary's understanding of its 2023 judicial interpretation on ascertainment of foreign law.