China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Chinese Court Accepts Case on Recognition of Kenyan Judgment

Sun, 29 Nov 2020
Categories: Insights
Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

avatar

 

In Jan. 2018, a Chinese local court accepted a case on recognition and enforcement of a Kenyan judgment, but the applicant withdrew the application afterwards.

On 4 Jan. 2018, the Ningbo Intermediate People’s Court in Zhejiang Province of China accepted Liu Chongliang(刘重亮) v. Webwave Electric Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (Kenya), Weng Shifang(翁士芳) and Peng Wanneng(彭万能) ((2018) Zhe 02 Xie Wai Ren No. 01)((2018)浙02协外认1号)) (hereinafter “the Kenya Case”). This case involved recognition and enforcement of a judgment rendered in Kenya, but the applicant withdrew the application afterwards.

On 9 May 2019, the Ningbo Court delivered a ruling to grant the request of withdrawal.

According to our understanding, China has not signed a treaty involving the recognition and enforcement of judgments with Kenya, and the Chinese courts had not accepted cases concerning the recognition and enforcement of Kenyan judgments before this case.

In fact, up to now, among all African countries, China has only handled cases involving the recognition and enforcement of a Chadian judgment.

In the Chadian case, the Chinese court refused to recognize and enforce the Chadian judgment on the ground that China had not concluded relevant treaties with Chad, and Chadian courts had not recognized or enforced Chinese judgments before (i.e. the absence of reciprocity).

Since 2015, China has been liberalizing its rules for the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. We hope Chinese courts to take a positive step towards recognition and enforcement of judgments rendered in African countries.

For more discussion on recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, please click here

Regrettably, the Kenya case was eventually withdrawn, and thus we have no chance to know the attitude of Chinese courts on this issue.

Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

Save as PDF

You might also like

Authenticating Documents for Use in Chinese Courts: Apostille or Not?

The 1961 Apostille Convention, effective in China as of November 2023, simplifies the authentication of foreign documents for use in Chinese courts by replacing traditional consular legalization with apostille. Note that authentication is only required for certain types of documents under Chinese law, and the apostille process applies only when the 1961 Convention is relevant.

Chinese Court Refuses to Recognize Russian Judgment Due to Due Process

In 2020, a local Chinese court in Beijing ruled against the recognition and enforcement of a Russian monetary judgment on the grounds that the party in absentia had not been properly summoned (the case of Chepetsky Mechanical Plant Joint-Stock Company (2020) Jing 04 Xie Wai Ren No. 2).

First Thai Monetary Judgment Enforced in China, Highlighting Presumptive Reciprocity in China-ASEAN Region

In 2024, a local Chinese court in Nanning, Guangxi, ruled to recognize and enforce a Thai monetary judgment. Apart from being the first case of enforcing Thai monetary judgments in China, it is also the first publicly reported case confirming a reciprocal relationship based on “presumptive reciprocity” (Guangxi Nanning China Travel Service Co., Ltd. v. Orient Thai Airlines Co., Ltd. (2023) Gui 71 Xie Wai Ren No. 1).