China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

First Foreign Arbitration Institution Starts Business in China - China Legal News

Sun, 15 Nov 2020
Categories: China Legal Trends

First Foreign Arbitration Institution Starts Business in China

 

The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Shanghai Service (世界知识产权组织仲裁和调解上海中心), the first business organization of foreign arbitration institutions in China, has begun handling cases in 2020.

In an article on the Chinese government's efforts to gradually open the arbitration market published in October 2019, Dr. Zhang Jian (张建) wrote in an earlier post, “In fact, for quite a long time, China did not allow foreign arbitration institutions to carry out any activities in mainland China, but only allowed the parties involved in foreign-related cases to seek arbitration abroad. Since then, China had gradually allowed foreign institutions to set up representative offices in mainland China, but the functions of which were mainly limited to publicity, promotion, communication, and liaison activities, with arbitration business excluded. It was not until July 2019 that China formally allowed foreign arbitration institutions to set up business organizations in mainland China to carry out arbitration activities.” 

Subsequently, as a first result of the Chinese government’s efforts to achieved its goal, on 18 Oct.2019, with the approval of China's Ministry of Justice, the first business organization of foreign arbitration institutions, i.e. the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Shanghai Service, came into existence upon the registration in the Shanghai Judicial Bureau.

The image below is the registration certificate of this organization issued by the Shanghai Judicial Bureau. The official name of the certificate is "Registration Certificate of Business Organization of Foreign Arbitration Institutions".

The organization’s business covers arbitration and mediation in cases concerning foreign-related intellectual property disputes in China, including: 

(1) case acceptance, hearing, mediation, deliberation, and award; 

(2) business consultation and guidance; 

(3) business seminars, training, communication, and promotion.

As Dr. Zhang Jian also explained in another earlier post, the awards by arbitrators of foreign arbitration institutions shall be considered as Chinese arbitral awards for enforcement, rather than foreign arbitral awards whose recognition and enforcement shall be subject to the New York Convention. As a consequence, compared to foreign arbitral awards, Chinese arbitral awards will be subject to stricter review under Chinese domestic law by Chinese courts.

Therefore, awards made by the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Shanghai Service or other business organizations of foreign arbitration institutions operating in China will also be subject to stricter review as Chinese arbitral awards.

We expect more foreign arbitration institutions to settle in China and will closely observe how Chinese courts review their awards.

 


Photo by Wu Dae (https://unsplash.com/@wudae_wing_chun) on Unsplash

 

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

SPC Releases Typical Cases to Support Hong Kong Arbitration

In September 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released six typical cases to demonstrate its support for Hong Kong arbitration, emphasizing judicial cooperation and the recognition of arbitral awards to foster international arbitration development.

SPC Sets Standards for Punitive Damages in Food Safety

In August 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued a judicial interpretation that addresses punitive damages in food safety cases, featuring typical cases to establish uniform standards and enhance consumer protection.

Authenticating Documents for Use in Chinese Courts: Apostille or Not?

The 1961 Apostille Convention, effective in China as of November 2023, simplifies the authentication of foreign documents for use in Chinese courts by replacing traditional consular legalization with apostille. Note that authentication is only required for certain types of documents under Chinese law, and the apostille process applies only when the 1961 Convention is relevant.

SPP Releases 2024 Mid-Year Case Data

In the first half of 2024, China's Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) reported significant increases in arrests and prosecutions, as well as a notable rise in retrials based on their recommendations in civil cases.

China Intensifies Crackdown on Cross-Border Telecom Fraud

In July 2024, China's Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP), Supreme People’s Court (SPC), and the Ministry of Public Security released ten typical cases to highlight their intensified efforts to combat cross-border telecom and online fraud, emphasizing organized crime and emerging technologies.

China's Clean Energy Progress Report (2024)

China's 2024 white paper titled “China’s Energy Transition” shows clean energy now makes up 58.2% of installed power capacity, with wind and solar increasing tenfold over a decade, and clean energy consumption rising from 15.5% to 26.4% of total energy use.

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Foreign Law Ascertainment

In July 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued its first batch of typical cases to illustrate the application of foreign laws, aiming to enhance the judiciary's understanding of its 2023 judicial interpretation on ascertainment of foreign law.