China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Interprets International Treaties & Practices in Chinese Courts

Thu, 09 May 2024
Categories: Insights

avatar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On 28 Dec. 2023, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued the “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of International Treaties and International Practices in the Trial of Foreign-related Civil and Commercial Cases” (hereinafter the “Interpretation”, 关于审理涉外民商事案件适用国际条约和国际惯例若干问题的解释), and typical cases on the application of international treaties and international practices in foreign-related civil and commercial cases.

As of now, the application of international treaties and international practices in China’s foreign-related civil and commercial cases covers various fields, including international trade, maritime affairs and maritime commerce, air transportation, intellectual property rights, environmental protection, and more. 

The major international treaties include the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air (1929 Warsaw Convention), the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air (1999 Montreal Convention), the  International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage (2001), the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (1969), the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (1992), the Athens Convention Relating to the Carriage of Passengers and Their Luggage by Sea (1974), and the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (1972), International Salvage Convention (1989), etc.

Common international practices applied by Chinese courts include the International Rules for the Interpretation of Trade Terms, the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, the Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees, the York-Antwerp Rules, and the Code of Safe Practice for Solid Bulk Cargoes, etc.

Highlights of the Interpretation include:

1. Where international treaties and Chinese laws have different provisions, the provisions of international treaties shall apply, except for clauses to which China has made reservations.

2. Where an international treaty provides that the parties concerned may exclude or partially exclude their application by agreement, if the parties concerned claim to exclude or partially exclude the application of the international treaty based on their agreement, the Chinese court shall uphold such claim.

3. Where the parties refer to any international treaty not binding upon China in their contract, the People’s Court may determine the rights and obligations between the parties in accordance with the contents of such international treaty, unless the international treaty violates the mandatory provisions of the laws and administrative regulations of China or impairs China’s sovereignty, security and public interests.

4. Where the parties to a foreign-related civil or commercial contract expressly choose to apply international practices and the parties claim to determine the rights and obligations between the parties to the contract in accordance with international practices, Chinese courts shall uphold such claim.

5. Where there are no provisions in Chinese law or the international treaties concluded or acceded to by China, the Chinese courts may apply international practice. If a party claims to exclude the application of international practice only on the ground that it was not expressly chosen, the Chinese court shall not uphold such claim.

 

 

 

Photo by hiurich granja on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Authenticating Documents for Use in Chinese Courts: Apostille or Not?

The 1961 Apostille Convention, effective in China as of November 2023, simplifies the authentication of foreign documents for use in Chinese courts by replacing traditional consular legalization with apostille. Note that authentication is only required for certain types of documents under Chinese law, and the apostille process applies only when the 1961 Convention is relevant.

Chinese Court Refuses to Recognize Russian Judgment Due to Due Process

In 2020, a local Chinese court in Beijing ruled against the recognition and enforcement of a Russian monetary judgment on the grounds that the party in absentia had not been properly summoned (the case of Chepetsky Mechanical Plant Joint-Stock Company (2020) Jing 04 Xie Wai Ren No. 2).

SPC Releases Guiding Cases on Minor Protection

In May 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued guiding cases on judicial protection for minors, addressing issues like school bullying, domestic abuse of minors, and marital guardianship.

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Yellow River Protection

In May 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released typical cases demonstrating judicial efforts to protect the Yellow River Basin's ecology, coinciding with the first anniversary of the Yellow River Protection Law.

SPC Releases Typical Labor Dispute Cases

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released six typical cases on labor disputes to guide similar cases, emphasizing worker rights and clarifying limitations on non-compete agreements.

First Thai Monetary Judgment Enforced in China, Highlighting Presumptive Reciprocity in China-ASEAN Region

In 2024, a local Chinese court in Nanning, Guangxi, ruled to recognize and enforce a Thai monetary judgment. Apart from being the first case of enforcing Thai monetary judgments in China, it is also the first publicly reported case confirming a reciprocal relationship based on “presumptive reciprocity” (Guangxi Nanning China Travel Service Co., Ltd. v. Orient Thai Airlines Co., Ltd. (2023) Gui 71 Xie Wai Ren No. 1).

Decoding the Turning Point: A Closer Look at China’s Recognition of Japanese Bankruptcy

This follow-up article focuses on the Chinese Court's detailed review of the Shanghai International Corporation case in 2023, highlighting the significance of reciprocity in cross-border bankruptcy proceedings and underscoring China's evolving approach to recognizing foreign judgments (See In re Shanghai International Corporation (2021) Hu 03 Xie Wai Ren No.1).