China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Chinese Court Accepts Case on Recognition of Kenyan Judgment

Sun, 29 Nov 2020
Categories: Insights
Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

avatar

 

In Jan. 2018, a Chinese local court accepted a case on recognition and enforcement of a Kenyan judgment, but the applicant withdrew the application afterwards.

On 4 Jan. 2018, the Ningbo Intermediate People’s Court in Zhejiang Province of China accepted Liu Chongliang(刘重亮) v. Webwave Electric Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (Kenya), Weng Shifang(翁士芳) and Peng Wanneng(彭万能) ((2018) Zhe 02 Xie Wai Ren No. 01)((2018)浙02协外认1号)) (hereinafter “the Kenya Case”). This case involved recognition and enforcement of a judgment rendered in Kenya, but the applicant withdrew the application afterwards.

On 9 May 2019, the Ningbo Court delivered a ruling to grant the request of withdrawal.

According to our understanding, China has not signed a treaty involving the recognition and enforcement of judgments with Kenya, and the Chinese courts had not accepted cases concerning the recognition and enforcement of Kenyan judgments before this case.

In fact, up to now, among all African countries, China has only handled cases involving the recognition and enforcement of a Chadian judgment.

In the Chadian case, the Chinese court refused to recognize and enforce the Chadian judgment on the ground that China had not concluded relevant treaties with Chad, and Chadian courts had not recognized or enforced Chinese judgments before (i.e. the absence of reciprocity).

Since 2015, China has been liberalizing its rules for the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. We hope Chinese courts to take a positive step towards recognition and enforcement of judgments rendered in African countries.

For more discussion on recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, please click here

Regrettably, the Kenya case was eventually withdrawn, and thus we have no chance to know the attitude of Chinese courts on this issue.

Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

Save as PDF

You might also like

Decoding the Turning Point: A Closer Look at China’s Recognition of Japanese Bankruptcy

This follow-up article focuses on the Chinese Court's detailed review of the Shanghai International Corporation case in 2023, highlighting the significance of reciprocity in cross-border bankruptcy proceedings and underscoring China's evolving approach to recognizing foreign judgments (See In re Shanghai International Corporation (2021) Hu 03 Xie Wai Ren No.1).

SPC Interprets International Treaties & Practices in Chinese Courts

In December 2023, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) reaffirmed the supremacy of international treaties over domestic laws in foreign-related civil and commercial cases with its “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of International Treaties and International Practices”(关于审理涉外民商事案件适用国际条约和国际惯例若干问题的解释).

China’s Wenzhou Court Recognizes a Singapore Monetary Judgment

In 2022, a local Chinese court in Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, ruled to recognize and enforce a monetary judgment made by the Singapore State Courts, as highlighted in one of the typical cases related to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) recently released by China’s Supreme People’s Court (Shuang Lin Construction Pte. Ltd. v. Pan (2022) Zhe 03 Xie Wai Ren No.4).