China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s Xiamen Int'l Tribunal Releases Consensual Jurisdiction Model Clauses

Tue, 12 Nov 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

In April 2024, the Xiamen International Commercial Tribunal (hereinafter the “XICT”) released the “Consensual Jurisdiction Model Clauses” (协议管辖示范条款, hereinafter the “Model Clauses”) in both Chinese and English.

The “Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (2023 Amendment)” has expanded the jurisdiction of Chinese courts over foreign-related civil cases, emphasizing party autonomy in jurisdiction agreements and abolishing the “actual connection” requirement.

Related Posts:

In this context, the Model Clauses aims to facilitate advance planning and provide guidance to Chinese and foreign commercial entities when entering into trade, investment, and other commercial agreements. The XICT hopes to encourage international commercial parties to choose submit their disputes to its jurisdiction when entering into agreements, positioning the tribunal as a preferred venue for resolving international commercial disputes.

For instance, as the Basic Jurisdiction Clause suggests, “any dispute arising out of or in connection with the present contract (agreement) shall be exclusively and irrevocably submitted to Xiamen International Commercial Tribunal of Fujian province for decision under the jurisdiction of the People’s Republic of China”.

As the accompanying notice indicates, “parties of the present contract (agreement) who adopt this consensual jurisdiction model clauses have explicitly chosen exclusive jurisdiction to avoid parallel proceedings and avail themselves of the extraterritorial judgment recognition and enforcement framework provided by the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements”.

In January 2022, the Xiamen Intermediate People’s Court was approved by China’s Supreme People’s Court to establish the XICT.

Related Posts:

 

Photo by 成 川 on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.

SPC Releases IP Protection Cases in Seed Industry

In October 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released key judicial protection cases to strengthen intellectual property rights in the seed industry, focusing on plant variety and breeding material disputes.

China Defines Rules for Calculating Trademark Infringement Gains

In October 2024, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) jointly issued the “Measures for Calculating Illegal Business Revenue in Trademark Infringement Cases”, which provide detailed operational guidelines for trademark enforcement authorities to calculate illegal business revenue.