China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Enacts Criminal Law Amendment (XII)

Wed, 22 May 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 


On 29 Dec. 2023, the Seventh Session of the Standing Committee of the Fourteenth National People’s Congress (NPC) of China passed the Amendment (XII) to the Criminal Law.

This amendment mainly covers two aspects:

First, it strengthens the punishment for the crime of bribery.

The NPC believes that in China’s anti-corruption efforts, the following problems exist with respect to bribery: (1) the significant imbalance exists between the number of bribery cases and that of bribe-taking cases; (2) a high proportion of bribers are not prosecuted for criminal liabilities; (3) the problem of lenient punishment for bribery still exists. The NPC believes that this is not conducive to cracking down on the crime of bribery and accepting bribes. Therefore, the NPC believes that criminal accountability should be strengthened in serious bribery cases.

Second, it aims to protect private enterprises by increasing the punishment for bribery within them.

The Criminal Law contains provisions on corruption crimes related to state-owned companies and enterprises, but such provisions are not applicable to private enterprises. The NPC considers that this is detrimental to the protection of property rights of private enterprises and entrepreneurs’ rights and interests. Therefore, this Amendment to the Criminal Law adds crimes related to the intentional breach of trust by employees of private enterprises to damage the interests of enterprises.

China’s Criminal Law was enacted in 1997, and the first amendment, Amendment (I) to the Criminal Law, was promulgated in 1999. To date, the latest amendment is Amendment (XII) to the Criminal Law enacted this time.

 

 

 

 

Photo by niu niu on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)