China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Imposes First Administrative Penalty in Cross-Border Accounting Audit Supervision

Tue, 23 Aug 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

In July 2022, China’s Ministry of Finance (MOF) launched an investigation into the Fujian Accsoft Technology Development Co Ltd. (福建埃森思索科技发展有限公司), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Malaysia-listed Lambo Group Berhad, and its related accounting firm, the Shandong Branch of Zhongxingcai Guanghua Certified Public Accountants (中兴财光华会计师事务所), and imposed penalties on these companies.

It is the first time the MOF has imposed administrative penalties in cross-border accounting audit supervision. More specifically, it is the first time that Chinese law-enforcement authorities have assisted in investigating accounting fraud in China upon request by a foreign government.

This case, in our opinion, offers a viable remedy for the financial fraud committed by Chinese companies with overseas listings. It indicates that the government of the region where the company is listed (e.g., the United States) can seek assistance from the Chinese government in investigating financial fraud by the company’s Chinese subsidiaries.

On 13 July 2022, the MOF released the No.42 Accounting Information Quality Inspection Announcement (中华人民共和国财政部会计信息质量检查公告第四十二号), stating that its investigation into this fraud was initiated by Malaysia’s request for assistance and based on the Memorandum of Understanding between the Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China and Securities Commission Malaysia for Cross-border Regulatory Cooperation on Accounting and Audit Matters.

 

 

Cover Photo by Elijah Chen on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Revises Anti-Money Laundering Law

China's newly revised Anti-Money Laundering Law, effective January 1, 2025, strengthens regulations on financial institutions, enhances AML obligations, and includes measures to prevent terrorist financing.

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.

SPC Releases IP Protection Cases in Seed Industry

In October 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released key judicial protection cases to strengthen intellectual property rights in the seed industry, focusing on plant variety and breeding material disputes.