China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s MOJ Reports on Judicial Assistance Cases in Civil and Commercial Matters in 2022

Wed, 08 Feb 2023

The International Legal Cooperation Center (the “ILCC”) of China’s Ministry of Justice (MOJ) disclosed relevant information on the MOJ website.

As of the end of December 2022, the ILCC has effectively performed the functions of a central authority for judicial assistance in civil and commercial matters on behalf of the MOJ according to the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters, the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters, and bilateral treaties on judicial assistance in civil and commercial matters. The specific cases handled are as follows.

Related Post:

1. Receiving foreign requests for judicial assistance

Among the 1692 judicial assistance requests received by the MOJ from foreign countries, 1,571 were related to the service of documents, and 121 were related to evidence-taking and the recognition and enforcement of judgments.

2. Making requests for judicial assistance abroad

Among the 820 judicial assistance requests made by the MOJ to foreign countries, 814 were for the service of documents, and six were for recognition and enforcement of judgments.

3. Concluding all kinds of judicial assistance requests

The MOJ provided judicial assistance to foreign countries in 1,827 cases.

The above cases involve the United States, Canada, Vietnam, Japan, Australia, Spain, Germany, United Kingdom, New Zealand, South Korea, France, Italy, Russia, and other countries, and the causes of actions involve various civil and commercial activities.

 

 

 

Cover Photo by David Veksler on Unsplash

Contributors: China Laws Portal Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.