China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Centralize Jurisdiction over International Cases, Starting from Hainan's Two Foreign-related Tribunals

Sat, 07 Mar 2020
Categories: China Legal Trends
Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

 

Hainan’s newly-established First and Second Foreign-related Civil and Commercial Tribunals marks China’s first step towards a more centralized administration system on international cases.

Two tribunals were set up in Hainan, China’s southernmost province, to centrally hear foreign-related civil and commercial cases in the whole province. It marks China’s first step towards a more centralized administration system on international cases.

The two tribunals set up in Hainan Province were respectively named the First Foreign-related Civil and Commercial Tribunal (located at Haikou, the capital city of Hainan), and the Second Foreign-related Civil and Commercial Tribunal (located at Sanya, the most well-known seaside resort city in China).

It was the first time for China to try to centralize the foreign-related civil and commercial cases in the whole province to certain tribunals. Previously, these cases were usually handled by competent courts at primary and intermediate levels.

Hainan took this approach in order to better hear foreign-related civil and commercial cases.

Generally, Chinese judges in most local courts have very rare chances to deal with foreign-related civil and commercial cases, and therefore lack the related professional capability. Concentrated in certain tribunals, the foreign-related civil and commercial cases in the whole province will be heard by more experienced judges. The Supreme People’s Court (SPC) believes that this practice will provide investors with more stable expectations. [1]

China has established the pilot free trade zone (port) in Hainan, and has made efforts to set up a better cross-border commercial dispute settlement mechanism there. The SPC has also drawn up a corresponding plan for this purpose. [2]The establishment of foreign-related civil and commercial tribunals is part of the plan.


[1] 《海南第一、第二涉外民商事法庭海口知识产权法庭揭牌成立》, http://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-187641.html,

[2] 《最高人民法院关于为海南全面深化改革开放提供司法服务和保障的意见》, http://www.court.gov.cn/fabu-xiangqing-111631.html.

 

Photo by Agathè Yosefina(https://unsplash.com/@agathayosefina) on Unsplash

Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

Save as PDF

You might also like

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.

SPC Releases IP Protection Cases in Seed Industry

In October 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released key judicial protection cases to strengthen intellectual property rights in the seed industry, focusing on plant variety and breeding material disputes.

China Defines Rules for Calculating Trademark Infringement Gains

In October 2024, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) jointly issued the “Measures for Calculating Illegal Business Revenue in Trademark Infringement Cases”, which provide detailed operational guidelines for trademark enforcement authorities to calculate illegal business revenue.