China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Centralize Jurisdiction over International Cases, Starting from Hainan's Two Foreign-related Tribunals

Sat, 07 Mar 2020
Categories: China Legal Trends
Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

 

Hainan’s newly-established First and Second Foreign-related Civil and Commercial Tribunals marks China’s first step towards a more centralized administration system on international cases.

Two tribunals were set up in Hainan, China’s southernmost province, to centrally hear foreign-related civil and commercial cases in the whole province. It marks China’s first step towards a more centralized administration system on international cases.

The two tribunals set up in Hainan Province were respectively named the First Foreign-related Civil and Commercial Tribunal (located at Haikou, the capital city of Hainan), and the Second Foreign-related Civil and Commercial Tribunal (located at Sanya, the most well-known seaside resort city in China).

It was the first time for China to try to centralize the foreign-related civil and commercial cases in the whole province to certain tribunals. Previously, these cases were usually handled by competent courts at primary and intermediate levels.

Hainan took this approach in order to better hear foreign-related civil and commercial cases.

Generally, Chinese judges in most local courts have very rare chances to deal with foreign-related civil and commercial cases, and therefore lack the related professional capability. Concentrated in certain tribunals, the foreign-related civil and commercial cases in the whole province will be heard by more experienced judges. The Supreme People’s Court (SPC) believes that this practice will provide investors with more stable expectations. [1]

China has established the pilot free trade zone (port) in Hainan, and has made efforts to set up a better cross-border commercial dispute settlement mechanism there. The SPC has also drawn up a corresponding plan for this purpose. [2]The establishment of foreign-related civil and commercial tribunals is part of the plan.


[1] 《海南第一、第二涉外民商事法庭海口知识产权法庭揭牌成立》, http://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-187641.html,

[2] 《最高人民法院关于为海南全面深化改革开放提供司法服务和保障的意见》, http://www.court.gov.cn/fabu-xiangqing-111631.html.

 

Photo by Agathè Yosefina(https://unsplash.com/@agathayosefina) on Unsplash

Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC Interprets International Treaties & Practices in Chinese Courts

In December 2023, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) reaffirmed the supremacy of international treaties over domestic laws in foreign-related civil and commercial cases with its “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of International Treaties and International Practices”(关于审理涉外民商事案件适用国际条约和国际惯例若干问题的解释).

China Releases Typical Cases of Private Fund Crimes

In December 2023, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) and Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) jointly released five typical cases of private fund crimes, aiming to establish uniform standards for handling such crimes nationwide and combatting criminal activities within the private fund sector.

SPC Releases IP Guiding Cases

In December 2023, China’s Supreme People's Court issued its 39th batch of guiding cases focused on intellectual property rights, covering various aspects such as IPR infringement disputes, patent ownership, and copyright ownership.

SPC Releases Judicial Interpretation on Contract Law

In December 2023, China's Supreme People's Court issued a judicial interpretation on the Contract section of the Civil Code, aimed at guiding courts in adjudicating disputes and ensuring nationwide consistency in application.

China Introduces New Drunk Driving Convictions Standards Effective 2023

In December 2023, China announced updated standards for drunk driving convictions, stating that individuals who drive with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 80mg/100ml or higher on a breath test may be held criminally liable, according to the recent joint announcement by the Supreme People's Court, Supreme People's Procuratorate, Ministry of Public Security, and Ministry of Justice.