China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Publishes First Maritime Guiding Cases

Tue, 25 Feb 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 26 Nov. 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released the 41st batch of guiding cases, marking its first publication of maritime guiding cases.

This batch includes seven cases, covering areas such as maritime cargo transportation contracts, salvage operations, liability for ship collisions, the establishment of maritime liability limitation funds, and the recognition of foreign civil judgments.

以指导性案例235号Spar Shipping v Grand China Logistics (2018) Hu 72 Xie Wai Ren No.1 ((2018)沪72协外认1号)为例,this case marks the first time that an English monetary judgment has been enforced in China based on reciprocity.

Taking Guiding Case No. 235 Spar Shipping v Grand China Logistics (2018) Hu 72 Xie Wai Ren No.1 ((2018) 沪72协外认1号) as an example, this case marks the first time that an English monetary judgment has been enforced in China based on reciprocity.

Related Post:

As the “Highlights” of the case, when reviewing applications or requests for the recognition and enforcement of foreign court civil judgments and determining whether a reciprocal relationship exists, Chinese courts do not require that the foreign court have previously recognized or enforced a Chinese judgment or ruling as a prerequisite. If, under the laws of relevant foreign countries, civil judgments issued by Chinese courts can be recognized and enforced, and there are no precedents of that country refusing recognition or enforcement on the ground of lack of reciprocity, it can be determined that a reciprocal relationship exists between the two countries for the recognition and enforcement of civil judgments or rulings.

Related Post:

 

 

Photo by Freeman Zhou on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC Publishes First Maritime Guiding Cases

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People's Court (SPC) published its first batch of maritime guiding cases, addressing key issues such as maritime cargo contracts, ship collisions, and the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.

China Revises Anti-Money Laundering Law

China's newly revised Anti-Money Laundering Law, effective January 1, 2025, strengthens regulations on financial institutions, enhances AML obligations, and includes measures to prevent terrorist financing.

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.