China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases IP Protection Cases in Seed Industry

Thu, 12 Dec 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

In October 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released a batch of judicial protection cases related to intellectual property rights (IPR) in the seed industry, aiming to strengthen IP Protection in the seed sector and guide breed right holders to effectively protect their rights.

This batch consists of five cases, all adjudicated by the SPC’s Intellectual Property Court, involving disputes over infringement of new plant variety rights and technical secrets of breeding materials.

For instance, in the “LIHE 228” (利合228) corn plant variety infringement case, the court held that the fact that the criminal defendant engaged in unauthorized seed sales, as determined by a prior effective criminal judgment, could be used as a fact in the civil infringement case, thus freeing the rights holder from additional proof. Furthermore, based on prior effective civil judgments and announcements from the Heilongjiang Crop Variety Approval Committee, it can be determined that the allegedly infringing variety “HAYU 189” (哈育189) was substantially the same as the authorized variety “LIHE 228”. This decision effectively lowered the rights holder’s burden in rights protection, achieving coordinated protection across criminal, administrative, and civil aspects for plant variety rights.

 

 

Photo by JM Lova on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.