China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Alibaba Fined CNY 18.2 Billion for Anti-Monopoly Violations

Mon, 10 May 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 10 Apr. 2021, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), pursuant to the PRC Anti-monopoly Law, imposed an administrative penalty on Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. (hereinafter the “Alibaba Group”) for its abuse of market dominance in China’s services market involving online retail platforms, ordering Alibaba Group to stop its illegal activities and pay a fine of CNY 18.228 billion(USD 2.8 billion), which was equal to 4% of its domestic revenues in 2019 (CNY 455.712 billion).

Alibaba Group enjoys market dominance in the market of online retail platform service providers in China. Since 2015, Alibaba Group has been abusing its market dominance, requiring the business operators to accept its policy, “choose one from two”. According to this policy, business operators on Alibaba’s platform are prohibited from opening stores or participating in promotional activities on other competitive platforms. Moreover, a variety of reward and punishment measures are taken to ensure the implementation of such policy.

Such activities of Alibaba Group eliminates and restricts competition in the market of online retail platform service providers in China, impedes the free flow of goods, services and resources, affects the innovation and development of platform economy, infringes upon the legitimate rights and interests of business operators on the platform, and harms the interests of consumers as well. It thus constitutes an abuse of market dominance by “requiring the other party to the transaction to trade exclusively with it without justifiable reasons” as specified in subparagraph 1(4) of Article 17 of the PRC Anti-Monopoly Law.

While making the decision on administrative penalty in accordance with the PRC Administrative Penalty Law, the SAMR has issued the Administrative Guidelines to Alibaba Group, requiring it to adopt comprehensive ratification measures, such as regulating its own competitive behaviors, assuming the responsibilities as a platform service provider, strengthening the internal control and compliance management, and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of business operators and consumers on the platforms, etc., and to submit self-inspection and compliance reports to the SAMR for three consecutive years.

 

 

Cover Photo by viarami (https://pixabay.com/users/viarami-13458823/) on Pixabay

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Launches Gradual Retirement Reform

China's National People's Congress has approved a gradual increase in the statutory retirement age for men and women, set to begin on January 1, 2025, marking the first adjustment in over 70 years.

China Revises National Defense Education Law

In September 2024, the newly revised “National Defense Education Law of the People’s Republic of China” was passed by the National People’s Congress Standing Committee and came into effect on 21 September.

SPC Releases Typical Cases to Support Hong Kong Arbitration

In September 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released six typical cases to demonstrate its support for Hong Kong arbitration, emphasizing judicial cooperation and the recognition of arbitral awards to foster international arbitration development.

SPC Sets Standards for Punitive Damages in Food Safety

In August 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued a judicial interpretation that addresses punitive damages in food safety cases, featuring typical cases to establish uniform standards and enhance consumer protection.

Authenticating Documents for Use in Chinese Courts: Apostille or Not?

The 1961 Apostille Convention, effective in China as of November 2023, simplifies the authentication of foreign documents for use in Chinese courts by replacing traditional consular legalization with apostille. Note that authentication is only required for certain types of documents under Chinese law, and the apostille process applies only when the 1961 Convention is relevant.

SPP Releases 2024 Mid-Year Case Data

In the first half of 2024, China's Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) reported significant increases in arrests and prosecutions, as well as a notable rise in retrials based on their recommendations in civil cases.