China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Revises Rules on Mainland China - Taiwan Judgment Recognition

Thu, 20 Mar 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 25 Dec. 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) announced a decision to amend the “Regulations on the Recognition and Enforcement of Civil Judgments of Courts in Taiwan” (hereinafter the “Regulations”, 最高人民法院关于认可和执行台湾地区法院民事判决的规定), which took effect on 1 Jan. 2025.

The amended Regulations clearly states that parties holding civil judgments of Taiwanese courts, as well as their successors or persons succeeding to their rights, may apply to Mainland Chinese courts for recognition and enforcement of such judgments. The Regulations also provides specific provisions on the materials to be submitted when applying for recognition of Taiwanese civil judgments, and the circumstances under which Taiwanese civil judgments may not be recognized.

In addition, a new provision has been added to address conflicts of jurisdiction between Chinese Mainland and Taiwan. It stipulates that, when two litigation proceedings are still pending for the same dispute in a court of Chinese Mainland—one for the recognition and enforcement of a Taiwanese judgment and the other for an ordinary litigation procedure—the recognition and enforcement procedure will take precedence. The ordinary litigation procedure will be suspended and await the outcome of the recognition and enforcement procedure before proceeding accordingly.

This solution was first introduced in the 2023 revision of the Chinese Civil Procedure Law (CPL), specifically in Article 302. Art. 302 applies in cases where parallel proceedings are still pending before a Chinese court when recognition and/or enforcement of a foreign judgment is sought in China.

In the field of judgment recognition and enforcement, this Regulations aligns with the CPL, both reflecting support for promoting the global circulation of judgments.

Related Post:

 

 

Photo by Hanson Lu on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC Revises Rules on Mainland China - Taiwan Judgment Recognition

China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) has amended regulations on the mutual recognition and enforcement of civil judgments between Mainland China and Taiwan, clarifying application procedures, exceptions, and jurisdictional conflicts, effective January 1, 2025.

China Establishes Shanghai International Commercial Court

The Shanghai International Commercial Court was established in December 2024 as a division of the Shanghai First Intermediate People’s Court, with exclusive jurisdiction over foreign-related commercial cases and arbitration judicial review, along with newly released jurisdictional regulations and model clauses.

SPC Issues Guiding Cases on Gig Worker Protection

In December 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court issued its first guiding cases on gig worker labor disputes, clarifying criteria for determining employment relationships with platform companies.

China Amends Supervision Law to Strengthen Oversight

The newly amended Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China, effective June 1, 2025, strengthens oversight, limits supervisory powers, and enhances protections for citizens' rights through standardized enforcement.

China Regulates Takeout Marketing to Curb Food Waste

In November 2024, China issued new guidelines restricting food delivery marketing to curb waste by prohibiting promotions that encourage overeating, setting reasonable order quantities, and optimizing discount mechanisms.

China's First Third-Party Funding Arbitration Case Named Top Ten by Beijing Court

In November 2024, the Beijing Fourth Intermediate People's Court selected China's first third-party funding-related arbitration case (Ruili Airlines Co., Ltd. et al. v. CLC Aircraft Leasing (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.(2022) Jing 04 Min Te No. 368-369 ), as one of its top ten typical cases, setting a precedent for judicial review of arbitration involving third-party funding.