China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Issues Regulation on Ecological Protection Compensation

On 6 Apr. 2024, Premier Li Qiang signed the Order No. 779 of the State Council, promulgating the “Regulation on Ecological Protection Compensation” (生态保护补偿条例, hereinafter the “Regulation”), which came into force on 1 July 2024.

According to the Regulation, ecological protection compensation is an incentive institutional arrangement for providing compensation to entities and individuals engaged in ecological protection according to regulations or agreements through mechanisms such as vertical fiscal compensation, inter-regional horizontal compensation, and market mechanism compensation. The Regulation specifies the categorization of compensation in eight major areas, including forests, grasslands, wetlands, deserts, and oceans.

The highlights of the Regulation are as follows.

  • It regulates vertical fiscal compensation. The State shall provide compensation, through fiscal transfers or other methods, to the entities and individuals engaged in the protection of important ecological and environmental factors as well as those who carry out ecological protection in major functional ecological zones.
  • It improves inter-regional horizontal compensation. The State shall encourage, guide, and promote the establishment of an ecological protection compensation mechanism through negotiation and other means between the people’s governments of ecologically benefited areas and ecological protection areas.
  • It promotes market mechanism compensation. The State shall maximize the role of market mechanisms and encourage social forces and local people’s governments to make ecological protection compensation through the purchase of ecological products and services and other methods according to market rules.

 

 

 

Photo by manos koutras on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Revises Anti-Money Laundering Law

China's newly revised Anti-Money Laundering Law, effective January 1, 2025, strengthens regulations on financial institutions, enhances AML obligations, and includes measures to prevent terrorist financing.

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.