China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Launches Overseas Video Notarization

Mon, 13 Jun 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 5 May 2022, China’s Ministry of Justice issued the “Notice on Piloting Overseas Video Notarization” (《关于推进海外远程视频公证试点工作的通知》, hereinafter referred to as the “Notice”).

Instructed by the Notice, Chinese embassies and consulates abroad are now cooperating with domestic notary institutions to help Chinese citizens overseas notarize documents via video. This innovative service can greatly save time, reduce money, and bring convenience to citizens who cannot return to China due to the pandemic.

Citizens qualified to apply for overseas remote video notarization shall be Chinese mainland residents with the nationality of the People’s Republic of China who have resided for a long period in the countries where the pilot Chinese embassies and consulates (as listed in the Annex of the Notice) are located.

According to the Notice, matters eligible for overseas remote video notarization include declarations, entrustments (including real estate, equity, and inheritance), marital status, nationality, name, birth, death, kinship, non-criminal record, experience, education, certificates (licenses), as well as signatures, seals, and text conformity of documents.

A total of 65 overseas Chinese embassies and consulates are carrying out the pilot, including 22 in Asia, 24 in Europe, 7 in Oceania and 4 in Africa, and 8 in the Americas.

On the morning of 5 May, the Chinese Embassy in Singapore, together with the Tianjin Hexin Notary Office, conducted the first overseas video notarization.

 

 

Cover Photo by Ran Zhao on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Revises Anti-Money Laundering Law

China's newly revised Anti-Money Laundering Law, effective January 1, 2025, strengthens regulations on financial institutions, enhances AML obligations, and includes measures to prevent terrorist financing.

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.

SPC Releases IP Protection Cases in Seed Industry

In October 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released key judicial protection cases to strengthen intellectual property rights in the seed industry, focusing on plant variety and breeding material disputes.