China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Protects Cultural Property Through Public Interest Litigation - China Legal News

Sat, 09 Jan 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 

China’s procuratorates attach importance to public interest litigation in connection with the protection of cultural property.

On 2 Dec. 2020, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) released ten typical cases relating to the public interest litigation on the protection of cultural relics and cultural heritage, clarifying that the protection of cultural relics and cultural heritage will be regarded as the key tasks to develop procuratorial public interest litigation, which will be deployed and promoted further.

For the competences of procuratorial organs to initiate public interest litigation, please refer to our previous post.

The typical cases released this time involve a wide range of cultural relics, including ancient sites, ancient tombs, grotto temples, traditional buildings, traditional villages and so on. The manners of supervision include both administrative public interest litigation and civil public interest litigation. Specific situations subject to supervision include the destruction of cultural relics by legal persons through illegal construction, illegal reconstruction or occupation of cultural relics, damage to cultural relics due to theft or excavation, and damage to cultural relics caused by property owners' failure to obtain authorization or inability to make repairs. The subjects under the supervision include local governments, cultural relics departments or other administrative organs, entities or individuals who damage cultural relics, etc.

Contributors: Yanru Chen 陈彦茹

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Revises Anti-Money Laundering Law

China's newly revised Anti-Money Laundering Law, effective January 1, 2025, strengthens regulations on financial institutions, enhances AML obligations, and includes measures to prevent terrorist financing.

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.

SPC Releases IP Protection Cases in Seed Industry

In October 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released key judicial protection cases to strengthen intellectual property rights in the seed industry, focusing on plant variety and breeding material disputes.

China Defines Rules for Calculating Trademark Infringement Gains

In October 2024, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) jointly issued the “Measures for Calculating Illegal Business Revenue in Trademark Infringement Cases”, which provide detailed operational guidelines for trademark enforcement authorities to calculate illegal business revenue.