China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Releases Typical Cases of IPR Law Enforcement to Strengthen Protection of Olympic Symbols

Mon, 13 Jun 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 21 Apr. 2022, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SMAR) released twenty typical cases involving IPR law enforcement.

These cases involve trademark infringement, patent counterfeiting, disturbing the order of trademark agency market by improper means, bad-faith applications for trademark registration, conducting patent agency business without licenses and other illegal acts.

Among them, two cases involve the protection of exclusive rights to Olympic symbols.

In these two cases, Nanjing Jianbo Protective Equipment Co., Ltd. sold masks with Olympic symbols without authorization, and Chongqing Fuling Zhacai Group Co., Ltd. published pictures containing the “Tokyo Olympics” on its social media platforms and websites without the authorization of the right holder of the Olympic symbols.

China’s law enforcement authorities believed that the aforementioned acts had infringed the exclusive rights of Olympic symbols, and the parties involved shall be imposed corresponding administrative penalties.

According to the “Regulations on the Protection of Olympic Symbols”, the five Olympic rings, Olympic flag, Olympic motto, Olympic emblem, Olympic anthem of the International Olympic Committee and exclusive expressions such as Olympic, Olympia, and Olympic Games and the abbreviations thereof are all Olympic symbols and are protected by law. No one may use Olympic symbols for commercial purposes without the authorization of the right holders of the Olympic symbols.

 

 

Cover Photo by Yingchih on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Revises Anti-Money Laundering Law

China's newly revised Anti-Money Laundering Law, effective January 1, 2025, strengthens regulations on financial institutions, enhances AML obligations, and includes measures to prevent terrorist financing.

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.

SPC Releases IP Protection Cases in Seed Industry

In October 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released key judicial protection cases to strengthen intellectual property rights in the seed industry, focusing on plant variety and breeding material disputes.

China Defines Rules for Calculating Trademark Infringement Gains

In October 2024, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) jointly issued the “Measures for Calculating Illegal Business Revenue in Trademark Infringement Cases”, which provide detailed operational guidelines for trademark enforcement authorities to calculate illegal business revenue.