China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s Arbitration Institutions Release 2022 Annual Reports

Mon, 03 Apr 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

The four major arbitration institutions in mainland China include the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC), the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC), the Shanghai International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (Shanghai International Arbitration Center, SHIAC), and the Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration (SCIA), all of which have recently released arbitration statistics report for 2022.

  1. The number of cases accepted and the amount involved

Arbitration Institutes

Case Number

Money Amount(RMB/Yuan)

CIETAC

4,086

126.9 billion

BAC

8,421

97.035 billion

SHIAC

2,576

62.876 billion

SCIA

8,280

127.261 billion

  1. The number of cases accepted in international arbitration and the amount involved

Arbitration Institutes

Case Number

Money Amount(RMB/Yuan)

CIETAC

642

37.4 billion

BAC

221

9.612 billion

SHIAC

196

N/A

SCIA

384

42 billion

  1. Duration of hearing arbitration cases

Arbitration Institutes

Number of Days From Registration to Conclusion

Number of Days From the Composition of the Tribunal to Conclusion

BAC

175.95

107.05

SCIA

168

89

  1. The number of cases using non-Chinese languages in the arbitration

Arbitration Institutes

Case Number

CIETAC

115

BAC

7

SHIAC

20

SCIA

13

 

 

Cover Photo by Li Yang on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.

SPC Releases IP Protection Cases in Seed Industry

In October 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released key judicial protection cases to strengthen intellectual property rights in the seed industry, focusing on plant variety and breeding material disputes.

China Defines Rules for Calculating Trademark Infringement Gains

In October 2024, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) jointly issued the “Measures for Calculating Illegal Business Revenue in Trademark Infringement Cases”, which provide detailed operational guidelines for trademark enforcement authorities to calculate illegal business revenue.