China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Strengthens Management of Central SOEs Financing Guarantees to Further Controls Financial Risks

Wed, 29 Dec 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 19 Nov. 2021, the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (SASAC) issued the “Notice on Strengthening the Management of Central State-Owned Enterprises Financing Guarantees” (hereinafter “the Notice”, 关于加强中央企业融资担保管理工作的通知).

“Central State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs)” refers to the state-owned enterprises invested by the central government of China.

The Notice makes it clear that central SOEs shall not provide any form of guarantee to those outside the corporate group with no equity relationship engaged.

In principle, central SOEs are only allowed to provide financing guarantees to their subsidiaries or associates that qualify as a going concern, which has the resources needed to continue operating and meet its financial obligations.

In addition, central SOEs should be strictly in accordance with the shareholding ratio when providing guarantees for subsidiary enterprises and associate enterprises. They shall not provide guarantees to associate enterprises in excess of the shareholding ratio.

In recent years, the development of central SOEs has demonstrated some distinctive features, that is, the rapid development of financial business and the large scale of financial assets, which has also made them one of China's hidden financial risks.

The Notice mainly aims to prevent cross-transmission of debt risks arising from mutual financing or guarantees of such enterprises.

 

 

Cover Photo by Zhaoyang Chai on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Revises Anti-Money Laundering Law

China's newly revised Anti-Money Laundering Law, effective January 1, 2025, strengthens regulations on financial institutions, enhances AML obligations, and includes measures to prevent terrorist financing.

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.

SPC Releases IP Protection Cases in Seed Industry

In October 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released key judicial protection cases to strengthen intellectual property rights in the seed industry, focusing on plant variety and breeding material disputes.