China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Regulate Automotive Data Security

Wed, 22 Sep 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

In August 2021, the Cyberspace Administration of China, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, and the Ministry of Transport jointly issued the “Provisions on the Administration of Automotive Data Security (for Trial Implementation)” (hereinafter “the Provisions”, 汽车数据安全管理若干规定(试行)). The Provisions will come into force on 1 Oct. 2021.

The Provisions is aimed at regulating automotive data processing activities, protecting the legitimate rights and interests of individuals and organizations, safeguarding national security and social public interests, and promoting the reasonable development and utilization of automotive data as well.

The Provisions clarifies the following requirements for the processing of personal information: (1) Notification obligation. The automotive data processor, when processing personal information, shall inform the individuals of the type of personal information to be processed, the scenario for collection, the methods for ceasing the information collection, and other relevant information. (2) The obligation to obtain consent. The automotive data processor shall obtain the consent of the individual or be in line with other circumstances in accordance with laws and administrative regulations. (3) Anonymity requirement. Where the personal information collected is provided to others without the individual's consent for guaranteeing driving safety, the personal information that has been collected shall be anonymized.

In view of sensitive personal information, on the basis of performing the obligations of notification and obtaining the individual's separate consent, the automotive data processor shall also meet the specific requirements to define the purpose of processing, remind the individual of the collection status, and facilitate the individual to terminate the collection. In terms of biometric information such as fingerprints, voiceprints, facial information, and heart rhythms, no automotive data processor may collect such information only if it is deemed necessary to do so to enhance driving safety.

 

 

Cover Photo by Joshua Fernandez (https://unsplash.com/@joshuafernandez) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Beijing & Shanghai Unveil Low-Altitude Economy Plans

Beijing and Shanghai have announced plans to develop the low-altitude economy, aiming to grow the industry to CNY 100 billion and CNY 50 billion respectively by 2027, with a focus on aerial rescue, logistics, and passenger transport.

SPC Releases Typical Antitrust Cases

In September 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) published eight typical cases on antitrust and unfair competition, highlighting issues like price-fixing, market dominance abuse, and deceptive practices.

China Launches Gradual Retirement Reform

China's National People's Congress has approved a gradual increase in the statutory retirement age for men and women, set to begin on January 1, 2025, marking the first adjustment in over 70 years.

China Revises National Defense Education Law

In September 2024, the newly revised “National Defense Education Law of the People’s Republic of China” was passed by the National People’s Congress Standing Committee and came into effect on 21 September.

SPC Releases Typical Cases to Support Hong Kong Arbitration

In September 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released six typical cases to demonstrate its support for Hong Kong arbitration, emphasizing judicial cooperation and the recognition of arbitral awards to foster international arbitration development.

SPC Sets Standards for Punitive Damages in Food Safety

In August 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued a judicial interpretation that addresses punitive damages in food safety cases, featuring typical cases to establish uniform standards and enhance consumer protection.