China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Updates Evidence Rules on Administrative Enforcement of Copyright Law - China Legal News

Sat, 28 Nov 2020
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 

On 15 Nov. 2020, the National Copyright Administration issued the Circular on Further Improving the Examination and Identification of Evidence for Administrative Enforcement of Copyright Law (关于进一步做好著作权行政执法证据审查和认定工作的通知), which clarified the examination and identification of evidence for copyright administrative law enforcement from three aspects, namely proof of rights, evidence of infringement, and determination of infringement.

(1) In terms of proof of rights, where the complainant makes a copyright infringement complaint, the administrative department in the enforcement of copyright shall require the complainant to provide evidence of the alleged copyright or copyright-related rights. If there is no evidence to the contrary, the administrative department in the enforcement of copyright shall presume the author, publisher, performer or producer of sound recordings signed in the usual manner as the copyright holder of the work, performance or sound recording or the right holder of the copyright-related rights.

(2) In terms of evidence of infringement, infringing works, performances or sound recordings and purchase records; accounts, contracts and processing and production documents involving infringement; screenshots of photos, videos or web pages proving the infringement; the materials proving that the publishers, distributors forge or alter the authorization documents or the acts of the publishers, distributors are beyond the scope of authorization; and other materials that can prove infringement can be used as evidence to prove that the work, performance or sound recording has been allegedly infringed.

(3) In terms of the determination of infringement, where the publisher or producer of reproductions is unable to prove the lawful authorization of his/her publication or production, or the distributor of reproductions is unable to prove the lawful source of the reproductions he/she distributes, the administrative department in the enforcement of copyright shall determine that such act constitutes infringement.

For more about China's intellectual property law, please click here.

For more about China's evidence rule, please click here.

Contributors: Yanru Chen 陈彦茹

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Beijing & Shanghai Unveil Low-Altitude Economy Plans

Beijing and Shanghai have announced plans to develop the low-altitude economy, aiming to grow the industry to CNY 100 billion and CNY 50 billion respectively by 2027, with a focus on aerial rescue, logistics, and passenger transport.

SPC Releases Typical Antitrust Cases

In September 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) published eight typical cases on antitrust and unfair competition, highlighting issues like price-fixing, market dominance abuse, and deceptive practices.

China Launches Gradual Retirement Reform

China's National People's Congress has approved a gradual increase in the statutory retirement age for men and women, set to begin on January 1, 2025, marking the first adjustment in over 70 years.

China Revises National Defense Education Law

In September 2024, the newly revised “National Defense Education Law of the People’s Republic of China” was passed by the National People’s Congress Standing Committee and came into effect on 21 September.

SPC Releases Typical Cases to Support Hong Kong Arbitration

In September 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released six typical cases to demonstrate its support for Hong Kong arbitration, emphasizing judicial cooperation and the recognition of arbitral awards to foster international arbitration development.

SPC Sets Standards for Punitive Damages in Food Safety

In August 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued a judicial interpretation that addresses punitive damages in food safety cases, featuring typical cases to establish uniform standards and enhance consumer protection.