China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Chinese Court Rules in TV Drama ‘IPartment’ versus Movie ‘Ipartment’

Sat, 04 Sep 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

In July 2021, Beijing Intellectual Property Court rendered the first-instance judgment on the trademark infringement and unfair competition case of Lianfan Computer Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) v. Shanghai Gaoge Film and Television Production Co., Ltd., Shanghai Film (Group) Co., Ltd., Tencent Pictures Cultural Communication Co., Ltd., Dadi Digital Cinema Corporation, Beijing Herui Film Culture Co., Ltd., and Wang Yuan (汪远) (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendants”). Pursuant to the judgment, the six Defendants were ordered to stop the acts of unfair competition, eliminate the impact arising therefrom and compensate the Plaintiff for the economic losses of CNY 4 million and reasonable expenses of CNY 300,000.

Beijing Intellectual Property Court held that the Plaintiff’s rights in ‘Ipartment’ (爱情公寓) Season 1 and ‘Ipartment’ Season 2 were confirmed by the binding judgment, and that the Plaintiff's authorization should be obtained if anyone wanted to use the name of the TV drama, character setting, and relevant plots, etc. After the production of the said TV drama is completed, it has been continuously broadcast on a number of TV channels and online platforms, and has gained high attention and popularity. As the name of the TV drama, “Ipartment” generally reflects the theme, content, comedy characteristics and type of the TV drama. It is identifiable in terms of the source of TV drama, and it can be regarded as a “commodity name with certain influence” and should be protected by the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. The Defendants, without the Plaintiff's authorization, used “Ipartment” as the name of the film involved in the case, promoted and publicized it. Subjectively, the Defendants had the intention to make use of the existing goodwill of the TV drama, “Ipartment” Seasons One and Two through the use of the same name. Objectively, the defendants caused confusion and misidentification among the relevant public, harmed the competitive interests of the Plaintiff, and constituted “unauthorized use of another commodity’s name which has certain influence” stipulated in Article 6 (1) of the Anti-unfair Competition Law, thus constituting unfair competition, and the Defendants should bear corresponding civil liabilities.

Beijing Intellectual Property Court also pointed out that the film title and character names in the case did not play a role in distinguishing the source of services, so the court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim that the act involved in the case infringed on the Plaintiff’s right to exclusively use the registered trademark.

 

 

Cover Photo by JuniperPhoton (https://unsplash.com/@juniperphoton) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Beijing Passes Autonomous Vehicle Regulation

In December 2024, Beijing passed the "Beijing Autonomous Vehicle Regulation," effective April 1, 2025, to promote development and safety, allowing self-driving cars in taxis, buses, and more after rigorous testing.

SPC Revises Rules on Mainland China - Taiwan Judgment Recognition

China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) has amended regulations on the mutual recognition and enforcement of civil judgments between Mainland China and Taiwan, clarifying application procedures, exceptions, and jurisdictional conflicts, effective January 1, 2025.

China Establishes Shanghai International Commercial Court

The Shanghai International Commercial Court was established in December 2024 as a division of the Shanghai First Intermediate People’s Court, with exclusive jurisdiction over foreign-related commercial cases and arbitration judicial review, along with newly released jurisdictional regulations and model clauses.

SPC Issues Guiding Cases on Gig Worker Protection

In December 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court issued its first guiding cases on gig worker labor disputes, clarifying criteria for determining employment relationships with platform companies.

China Amends Supervision Law to Strengthen Oversight

The newly amended Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China, effective June 1, 2025, strengthens oversight, limits supervisory powers, and enhances protections for citizens' rights through standardized enforcement.