China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Final Ruling Made in China: Return of a Mummified Buddha Statue

Wed, 07 Sep 2022
Editor: Lisa Bi

On 19 July 2022, the Fujian High People's Court, as the court of the second instance, rendered the final judgment in the case of the mummified Buddha Statue of Zhanggong Zushi (章公祖师, hereinafter ‘the Statue’), upholding the trial court judgment made by Sanming Intermediate People's Court, and ruling that the defendant Oscar Van Overeem, a Dutch collector, should return the Statue back to Chinese villagers.

Related Posts:

After the death in the Northern Song Dynasty, Zhanggong Zushi was mummified into a golden Buddha statue and enshrined in Puzhao Temple (普照堂), which was owned jointly by Yangchun Village and Dongpu Village in Wushan Township, Datian County. In December 2015, the Statue was found stolen by local villagers. The defendant claimed that he bought the Statue in Amsterdam, Netherlands, in 1996, without the relevant proof of purchase.

In March 2015, the Statue was publicly exhibited at the Hungarian Museum of Natural Science with the permission of the defendant, nearly 20 years after being stolen.

On 26 July 2018, the Sanming Intermediate People's Court of Fujian Province held a public hearing and made a ruling on 4 Dec. 2020.

The court of first instance ordered the defendant to return the Statue to the plaintiff Yangchun Villagers' Committee and Dongpu Villagers' Committee within 30 days from the effective date of the judgment. The defendant subsequently appealed to the High Court in Fujian.

The court of second instance held that the Statue is an illegally exported cultural object, and has multiple attributes of human remains, historical cultural relics and consecrated objects, which reflected the traditions and legacy of southern Fujian in China. As a long-term consecrated object worshipped by the local villagers, the Statue has been given special bonding and significance, and therefore, should be returned as stipulated by the law.

 

 

Cover Photo by Binyu Liu on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC Launches Diversified Dispute Resolution Case Database

In February 2025, China's Supreme People's Court launched a public “Diversified Dispute Resolution Case Database” with over 200 cases, showcasing mediation and arbitration examples across various dispute types to guide alternative dispute resolution.

Beijing Passes Autonomous Vehicle Regulation

In December 2024, Beijing passed the "Beijing Autonomous Vehicle Regulation", effective April 1, 2025, to promote development and safety, allowing self-driving cars in taxis, buses, and more after rigorous testing.

SPC Revises Rules on Mainland China - Taiwan Judgment Recognition

China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) has amended regulations on the mutual recognition and enforcement of civil judgments between Mainland China and Taiwan, clarifying application procedures, exceptions, and jurisdictional conflicts, effective January 1, 2025.

China Establishes Shanghai International Commercial Court

The Shanghai International Commercial Court was established in December 2024 as a division of the Shanghai First Intermediate People’s Court, with exclusive jurisdiction over foreign-related commercial cases and arbitration judicial review, along with newly released jurisdictional regulations and model clauses.

SPC Issues Guiding Cases on Gig Worker Protection

In December 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court issued its first guiding cases on gig worker labor disputes, clarifying criteria for determining employment relationships with platform companies.