China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Free Publication by ABLI: Ranking the Portability of ASEAN Judgments within ASEAN

Fri, 25 Mar 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends
Editor: C. J. Observer

CJO has previously reported the work of the Asian Business Law Institute (ABLI) relating to the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Asia, culminating in the release of the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Asia and the Asian Principles for the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments.

ABLI has recently released a free publication titled Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in ASEAN: Ranking the Portability of ASEAN Judgments within ASEAN, a derivative publication of its foreign judgments work. 

The jurisdictions within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, or ASEAN, are of diverse legal backgrounds. Specifically, Brunei, Myanmar, Malaysia and Singapore are common law jurisdictions, while Cambodia, Lao, Indonesia, Vietnam and Thailand are of civil law tradition. The remaining ASEAM member, the Philippines, is a hybrid jurisdiction.

Two primary hurdles have been identified as hindering efforts to improve the portability of ASEAN judgments within the bloc. First, some ASEAN jurisdictions, such as Indonesia and Thailand, have no law that allows foreign judgments to be recognised and enforced. Second, most civil law jurisdictions in ASEAN still have rather rigid requirements on reciprocity.

Three key takeaways can be gleaned from the ranking.  

First, Vietnamese judgments are found to be the most portable of ASEAN judgments within ASEAN. They can be enforced in seven out of the other nine ASEAN countries. This is mainly because Vietnam has the benefit of having bilateral agreements with Cambodia and Laos which allow its judgments to be enforced in the latter two jurisdictions.

Second, judgments rendered by the other civil law countries of ASEAN come in second place. They can be enforced in six out of nine ASEAN countries. 

Third, judgments from the common law countries of ASEAN and the hybrid jurisdiction of the Philippines are jointly in third place. They can be enforced in five out of nine ASEAN countries. 

Download the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in ASEAN: Ranking the Portability of ASEAN Judgments within ASEAN from https://payhip.com/b/OkhoH to find out the reasons behind this ranking result which may be surprising.

ABLI regularly publishes the latest developments in the field of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Asia on its website and LinkedIn.

 

 

Cover photo by 瓜田 月下 on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beijing & Shanghai Unveil Low-Altitude Economy Plans

Beijing and Shanghai have announced plans to develop the low-altitude economy, aiming to grow the industry to CNY 100 billion and CNY 50 billion respectively by 2027, with a focus on aerial rescue, logistics, and passenger transport.

SPC Releases Typical Antitrust Cases

In September 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) published eight typical cases on antitrust and unfair competition, highlighting issues like price-fixing, market dominance abuse, and deceptive practices.

China Launches Gradual Retirement Reform

China's National People's Congress has approved a gradual increase in the statutory retirement age for men and women, set to begin on January 1, 2025, marking the first adjustment in over 70 years.

China Revises National Defense Education Law

In September 2024, the newly revised “National Defense Education Law of the People’s Republic of China” was passed by the National People’s Congress Standing Committee and came into effect on 21 September.

SPC Releases Typical Cases to Support Hong Kong Arbitration

In September 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released six typical cases to demonstrate its support for Hong Kong arbitration, emphasizing judicial cooperation and the recognition of arbitral awards to foster international arbitration development.

SPC Sets Standards for Punitive Damages in Food Safety

In August 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued a judicial interpretation that addresses punitive damages in food safety cases, featuring typical cases to establish uniform standards and enhance consumer protection.