China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Free Publication by ABLI: Ranking the Portability of ASEAN Judgments within ASEAN

Fri, 25 Mar 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends
Editor: C. J. Observer

CJO has previously reported the work of the Asian Business Law Institute (ABLI) relating to the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Asia, culminating in the release of the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Asia and the Asian Principles for the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments.

ABLI has recently released a free publication titled Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in ASEAN: Ranking the Portability of ASEAN Judgments within ASEAN, a derivative publication of its foreign judgments work. 

The jurisdictions within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, or ASEAN, are of diverse legal backgrounds. Specifically, Brunei, Myanmar, Malaysia and Singapore are common law jurisdictions, while Cambodia, Lao, Indonesia, Vietnam and Thailand are of civil law tradition. The remaining ASEAM member, the Philippines, is a hybrid jurisdiction.

Two primary hurdles have been identified as hindering efforts to improve the portability of ASEAN judgments within the bloc. First, some ASEAN jurisdictions, such as Indonesia and Thailand, have no law that allows foreign judgments to be recognised and enforced. Second, most civil law jurisdictions in ASEAN still have rather rigid requirements on reciprocity.

Three key takeaways can be gleaned from the ranking.  

First, Vietnamese judgments are found to be the most portable of ASEAN judgments within ASEAN. They can be enforced in seven out of the other nine ASEAN countries. This is mainly because Vietnam has the benefit of having bilateral agreements with Cambodia and Laos which allow its judgments to be enforced in the latter two jurisdictions.

Second, judgments rendered by the other civil law countries of ASEAN come in second place. They can be enforced in six out of nine ASEAN countries. 

Third, judgments from the common law countries of ASEAN and the hybrid jurisdiction of the Philippines are jointly in third place. They can be enforced in five out of nine ASEAN countries. 

Download the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in ASEAN: Ranking the Portability of ASEAN Judgments within ASEAN from https://payhip.com/b/OkhoH to find out the reasons behind this ranking result which may be surprising.

ABLI regularly publishes the latest developments in the field of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Asia on its website and LinkedIn.

 

 

Cover photo by 瓜田 月下 on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.

SPC Releases IP Protection Cases in Seed Industry

In October 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released key judicial protection cases to strengthen intellectual property rights in the seed industry, focusing on plant variety and breeding material disputes.

China Defines Rules for Calculating Trademark Infringement Gains

In October 2024, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) jointly issued the “Measures for Calculating Illegal Business Revenue in Trademark Infringement Cases”, which provide detailed operational guidelines for trademark enforcement authorities to calculate illegal business revenue.

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Tourism Disputes

In September 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical tourism dispute cases, including health rights disputes caused by wild monkey attacks in Mount Emei, to guide courts in resolving common tourism conflicts and safeguarding tourists' legitimate rights and interests.

China Regulates Network Data Security

China's newly adopted “Regulation on Network Data Security Management”, effective January 1, 2025, seeks to standardize data processing, strengthen personal information protection, and tackle issues such as data security, risk assessments, and personalized profiling.

Beijing & Shanghai Unveil Low-Altitude Economy Plans

Beijing and Shanghai have announced plans to develop the low-altitude economy, aiming to grow the industry to CNY 100 billion and CNY 50 billion respectively by 2027, with a focus on aerial rescue, logistics, and passenger transport.

SPC Releases Typical Antitrust Cases

In September 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) published eight typical cases on antitrust and unfair competition, highlighting issues like price-fixing, market dominance abuse, and deceptive practices.