China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Knowing Judicial Interpretation in China - China Legal Research Guide

Thu, 19 Mar 2020
Categories: Insights

avatar

 

Judicial interpretation is a series of binding rules formulated by the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP).

I. What is judicial interpretation?

Judicial interpretation is the official interpretation made by the SPC and the SPP on the application of certain laws, and, therefore, has legal binding force. 

The power of the SPC and the SPP to formulate judicial interpretation derives from the provisions of China’s Legislation Law (立法法). According to the Legislation Law, the judicial interpretation of the SPC and the SPP should be made for specific legal provisions, and it should conform to the legislative purpose, principle and original intention of the legal provisions in question.

In order to make it clear how to formulate judicial interpretation, the SPC promulgated the Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Judicial Interpretation (最高人民法院关于司法解释工作的规定) in 2007. Likewise, the SPP also promulgated the Provisions of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate on Judicial Interpretation (最高人民检察院司法解释工作规定) in 2006, as amended in 2015 and 2019. 

The SPC’s judicial interpretation covers matters in civil and commercial law, criminal law and administrative law, while the SPP’s judicial interpretation mainly focuses on criminal cases. As for foreign parties, civil and commercial disputes are of their utmost concern in their contacts with China, so we will mainly introduce how the SPC formulate the judicial interpretation.

In addition, it should be noted that once the SPC’s judicial interpretation being implemented, all courts nationwide are bound by it. If a court makes a judgment based on the judicial interpretation, it shall invoke the judicial interpretation in the judgment.

II. What are the types of judicial interpretation? 

The SPC’s judicial interpretation can be divided into “interpretation”(解释), “regulation”(规定), “reply”(批复) and “decision”(决定).

Interpretation: the SPC issues interpretation to explain how to apply a specific law or how to apply the law in a certain kind of case and issue during the case trial. Generally speaking, “interpretation” is about the application of substantive law.

Regulation: the SPC issues regulation to interpret norms and opinions about how to promote adjudication work pursuant to the legislative purpose. In general, “regulation” is about the application of procedural law.

Reply: the SPC gives replies on the legal issues submitted by high people’s courts and the PLA Military Court during the case trial. Generally speaking, each “reply”, which in fact constitutes a rule per se, is the SPC’s opinions addressed to all courts nationwide on how to handle a specific case.

For the differences between “reply” and “response” (答复) of the SPC, please read the article “No, You Can't Ignore Responses of China’s Supreme People’s Court”.

Decision: the SPC adopts “decision” to modify or repeal certain judicial interpretation.

III. How is judicial interpretation formulated?

The SPC’s research office is responsible for drafting judicial interpretation, and the organization, coordination, compilation, etc.; the SPC’s adjudication committee decides whether to adopt the draft judicial interpretation submitted by the research office through voting.

The specific formulation process of judicial interpretation is as follows:

1. Soliciting needs

The research office solicits the needs for judicial interpretation submitted by various parties, such as the SPC’s adjudication committee, the SPC’s trial divisions, high people’s courts, representatives to the National People’s Congress (NPC) and members of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), other government authorities, social organizations, and citizens.

2. Planning

After summarizing the needs, the research office makes the annual project plan of judicial interpretation, and then the SPC’s adjudication committee decides whether to approve the same or not.

3. Drafting 

The SPC’s trial divisions, which specialize in hearing specific types of cases, are responsible for drafting the judicial interpretation in their respective fields.

4. Soliciting the NPC’s opinions

After the research office finalizes the draft of judicial interpretation and before it is submitted to the SPC’s adjudication committee for voting, the SPC will ask the NPC for its opinions on the draft.

5. Voting by the SPC’s adjudication committee

The SPC’s adjudication committee will discuss and vote on the draft judicial interpretation.

6. Issuance and announcement

If the SPC’s adjudication committee votes for the judicial interpretation, then it will be signed by the president or vice president of the SPC and issued in the form of the SPC’s announcement.

7. Filing with the NPC

The SPC shall submit the judicial interpretation to the NPC Standing Committee for filing within 30 days as of the date of promulgation.

 

 


Cover Photo by tong zhou(https://unsplash.com/@zt1970) on Unsplash.

Contributors: Guodong Du 杜国栋

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC Releases Typical Cases to Support Hong Kong Arbitration

In September 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released six typical cases to demonstrate its support for Hong Kong arbitration, emphasizing judicial cooperation and the recognition of arbitral awards to foster international arbitration development.

SPC Sets Standards for Punitive Damages in Food Safety

In August 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued a judicial interpretation that addresses punitive damages in food safety cases, featuring typical cases to establish uniform standards and enhance consumer protection.

Authenticating Documents for Use in Chinese Courts: Apostille or Not?

The 1961 Apostille Convention, effective in China as of November 2023, simplifies the authentication of foreign documents for use in Chinese courts by replacing traditional consular legalization with apostille. Note that authentication is only required for certain types of documents under Chinese law, and the apostille process applies only when the 1961 Convention is relevant.

China Intensifies Crackdown on Cross-Border Telecom Fraud

In July 2024, China's Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP), Supreme People’s Court (SPC), and the Ministry of Public Security released ten typical cases to highlight their intensified efforts to combat cross-border telecom and online fraud, emphasizing organized crime and emerging technologies.

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Foreign Law Ascertainment

In July 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued its first batch of typical cases to illustrate the application of foreign laws, aiming to enhance the judiciary's understanding of its 2023 judicial interpretation on ascertainment of foreign law.

SPC Releases Typical Cases of Financial Fraud

In June 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released five typical cases of financial fraud, aiming to strengthen the punishment of financial fraud, protect the legitimate rights and interests of investors, and promote the sound development of the industry.

SPC Releases Guiding Cases on Minor Protection

In May 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued guiding cases on judicial protection for minors, addressing issues like school bullying, domestic abuse of minors, and marital guardianship.