China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Rebuild Credit after Discipline? China Issues Rules to Restore Credit Information

Mon, 27 Feb 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 11 Jan. 2023, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) of China’s State Council released the “Measures on the Management of Credit Information Restoration after Correction of Dishonest Behaviors (For Trial Implementation)” (hereinafter the “Measures”, 失信行为纠正后的信用信息修复管理办法(试行)).

NDRC says China will not impose permanent disciplinary measures on dishonest entities.

To some extent, the disciplinary system for dishonesty has promoted various social entities to keep promises. However, the purpose of the disciplinary system for dishonesty is not to “abandon” the dishonest entities permanently, but to promote the correction of their dishonest behavior and rebuild their credit. Therefore, credit subjects who meet the relevant conditions can apply for credit information restoration.

What the credit subjects can repair is the dishonesty information, but not the dishonest behavior. In other words, the credit subjects can repair their state of dishonesty at the information level, but cannot “whitewash” the dishonest behavior and restore the honesty between people before the occurrence of the dishonest behavior.

Credit information can be restored by removing it from lists of seriously dishonest entities, stopping the display of administrative punishment information, and restoring other dishonesty information.

 

 

Cover Photo by Akira on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Revises Anti-Money Laundering Law

China's newly revised Anti-Money Laundering Law, effective January 1, 2025, strengthens regulations on financial institutions, enhances AML obligations, and includes measures to prevent terrorist financing.

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.

SPC Releases IP Protection Cases in Seed Industry

In October 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released key judicial protection cases to strengthen intellectual property rights in the seed industry, focusing on plant variety and breeding material disputes.

China Defines Rules for Calculating Trademark Infringement Gains

In October 2024, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) jointly issued the “Measures for Calculating Illegal Business Revenue in Trademark Infringement Cases”, which provide detailed operational guidelines for trademark enforcement authorities to calculate illegal business revenue.