China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shanghai Concludes China's First Ad Hoc Maritime Arbitration

Tue, 15 Oct 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

Recently, China’s first foreign-related ad hoc maritime arbitration case was concluded in Shanghai.

This case involved a dispute between two Shanghai companies over a crew management service contract for international routes. After the dispute arose, both parties entered into an arbitration agreement. They agreed to follow international maritime dispute resolution practices. In accordance with the ad hoc arbitration regulations implemented in Shanghai, they agreed to designate Shanghai as the seat of arbitration and Hongkou North Bund as the hearing venue. They independently agreed on the arbitration procedure and jointly appointed an expert with a high reputation and influence in the field of international shipping as the arbitrator. Subsequently, one of the parties submitted an arbitration application. After the arbitral tribunal was formed, the arbitration was conducted according to the agreed procedure, and a final and legally binding award was issued following the hearing.

In December 2023, the “Regulations of Shanghai Municipality on Promoting the Construction of the International Commercial Arbitration Center” (hereinafter the “Regulations”, 上海市推进国际商事仲裁中心建设条例), which was adopted upon deliberation by Shanghai Municipal People’s Congress Standing Committee, officially came into force. The Regulations is the first in China to introduce internationally accepted arbitration system rules, such as the seat of arbitration and ad hoc arbitration.

 

 

Photo by Himmel S on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.

SPC Releases IP Protection Cases in Seed Industry

In October 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released key judicial protection cases to strengthen intellectual property rights in the seed industry, focusing on plant variety and breeding material disputes.

China Defines Rules for Calculating Trademark Infringement Gains

In October 2024, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) jointly issued the “Measures for Calculating Illegal Business Revenue in Trademark Infringement Cases”, which provide detailed operational guidelines for trademark enforcement authorities to calculate illegal business revenue.