China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shanghai Greenlights First-Ever Ad Hoc Arbitration in China

Fri, 05 Apr 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 23 Nov. 2023, the Standing Committee of the Shanghai People’s Congress adopted the “Regulations on the Promotion of the Establishment of the International Commercial Arbitration Center in Shanghai” (上海市推进国际商事仲裁中心建设条例, hereinafter the “Regulations”).

Article 20 of the Regulations provides that:

  • Shanghai will explore the possibility of agreeing to conduct ad hoc arbitration in Shanghai for foreign-related matters in the commercial and maritime fields in accordance with specific arbitration rules and conducted by designated persons;
  • Ad hoc arbitration shall be conducted by following the principles of good faith, fairness, independence, and party autonomy. It shall not harm national interests, public interests, or the legitimate rights and interests of third parties and shall not violate mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations;
  • The specific rules for ad hoc arbitration shall be separately formulated by the Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Justice; and
  • Shanghai arbitration institutions and foreign arbitration service providers are encouraged to assist in forming panels and provide other services as agreed upon or requested by the parties.

In addition, the Regulations specifies that parties in arbitration proceedings may apply to the court for interim measures and evidence collection. For instance:

  • Before applying for arbitration and during the arbitration proceedings, parties may, in accordance with the law, apply to the court for property preservation, evidence preservation, and other measures to ensure the process of the arbitration, to ascertain disputed facts, or to enforce arbitral awards; and
  • In arbitration cases administered by Shanghai arbitration institutions or foreign arbitration service providers with the seat of arbitration in Shanghai, if the parties and their representatives are objectively unable to collect evidence on their own, and the arbitral tribunal finds it difficult to investigate and collect evidence, but it is necessary to do so and the evidence is located or can be collected in Shanghai, the courts in Shanghai may, upon the application of the arbitration institution, provide assistance.

 

 

Photo by Freeman Zhou on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.

SPC Releases IP Protection Cases in Seed Industry

In October 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released key judicial protection cases to strengthen intellectual property rights in the seed industry, focusing on plant variety and breeding material disputes.

China Defines Rules for Calculating Trademark Infringement Gains

In October 2024, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) jointly issued the “Measures for Calculating Illegal Business Revenue in Trademark Infringement Cases”, which provide detailed operational guidelines for trademark enforcement authorities to calculate illegal business revenue.