China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shanghai Maritime Court Issues Guidelines for Blockchain Evidence Review

Wed, 16 Nov 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 29 Sept. 2022, Shanghai Maritime Court held a symposium on “The Impact of Blockchain Technology’s Application on Maritime Justice and Relevant Service Guarantee Needs” and released the “Guidelines for Blockchain Evidence Review” (hereinafter the “Guidelines”, 区块链证据审查指南).

Chinese courts attach great importance to the role of blockchain in judicial activities, especially in evidence preservation, cross-department data sharing, mutual trust, and other areas.

As the evidence preservation services provided by judicial blockchain and third-party blockchain platforms greatly facilitate litigation, the electronic evidence stored on blockchain has been recognized by Chinese courts in judicial practice.

Earlier in this May, China’s Supreme People’s Court issued the “Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on Strengthening the Judicial Application of Blockchain” (hereinafter the “Opinions”, 最高人民法院关于加强区块链司法应用的意见), which refines the rules for the judicial application of blockchain.

On the basis of the Opinions, the Shanghai Maritime Court formulated the Guidelines, thereby introducing blockchain evidence to maritime trials.

In addition to the judicial blockchain platforms and third-party preservation platforms which are currently widely applied, the Guidelines also considers the electronic evidence generated by blockchain bills of lading, port management, cross-border settlement and other application platforms.

 

 

Cover Photo by Night Glow on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.

SPC Releases IP Protection Cases in Seed Industry

In October 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released key judicial protection cases to strengthen intellectual property rights in the seed industry, focusing on plant variety and breeding material disputes.

China Defines Rules for Calculating Trademark Infringement Gains

In October 2024, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) jointly issued the “Measures for Calculating Illegal Business Revenue in Trademark Infringement Cases”, which provide detailed operational guidelines for trademark enforcement authorities to calculate illegal business revenue.