China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases Typical Cases of Judicial Review of Arbitration

Wed, 26 Jun 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 16 Jan. 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released ten typical cases of judicial review of arbitration. The SPC aims to unify the standards for judicial review of arbitration across the country by publishing typical cases, which also helps guide arbitration institutions in handling arbitration cases in accordance with the law.

Taking Case 1 (2021) Yue 06 Xie Wai Ren No. 1 ((2021)粤06协外认1号) of the Foshan Intermediate People’s Court, Guangdong, as an example, the case involves the application for recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award of the International Commercial Arbitration Court under the Uzbekistan Chamber of Commerce and Industry by Uzbekistan Art Mosaic Co., Ltd. The case concerns a contract dispute over an international sale of goods between companies from China and Uzbekistan, with the foreign arbitral award made by an Uzbekistan arbitration institution.

In this case, the seal affixed by the Chinese party was not a legally registered official company seal. Taking into account the negotiation, signing, and performance of the contract, the court found that the foreign party had fulfilled its reasonable duty of care. Therefore, the court confirmed the existence of a valid arbitration agreement between the Chinese and foreign parties. This case reflects the Chinese courts’ good faith in fulfilling international treaty obligations, strict adherence to the New York Convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.

 

 

Photo by Alan Wu on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Revises Anti-Money Laundering Law

China's newly revised Anti-Money Laundering Law, effective January 1, 2025, strengthens regulations on financial institutions, enhances AML obligations, and includes measures to prevent terrorist financing.

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.