China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Foreign Law Ascertainment

Tue, 17 Sep 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 10 July 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released the first batch of typical cases on the ascertainment and application of foreign laws,aiming to enhance the judiciary’s understanding of the “Judicial Interpretation on the Ascertainment of Foreign Law”issued in 2023.

Related Post:

This batch includes five typical cases covering issues such as company capital contributions, sales contracts, guarantee contracts, multimodal transportation contracts, and engineering supervision contracts. The laws ascertained include those of the United States, United Kingdom, Mexico, Tajikistan, and Hong Kong SAR.

For instance, Case No.1, “Zhao v. Jiang et al. (2006) Hu Gao Min Si (Shang) Zhong Zi No. 19,” involved a foreign-related dispute over company capital contribution, with the issue being whether Zhao held the status of a shareholder and director in Company M.

This dispute was adjudicated based on the law of where company M is registered (Delaware, USA) , including relevant case law. During the trial, the parties presented expert legal opinions from U.S. law firms, providing relevant Delaware laws. The Chinese court examined the authenticity of the submitted excerpts from the Delaware General Corporation Law, Title 8, Chapter 1 of the Delaware Code and relevant case law through online verification and cross-examination, .

Ultimately, the Chinese court found, based on Delaware General Corporation Law and relevant case law, that Zhao had in fact become a shareholder and director of Company M.

 

 

Photo by Danyu Wang on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Foreign Law Ascertainment

In July 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued its first batch of typical cases to illustrate the application of foreign laws, aiming to enhance the judiciary's understanding of its 2023 judicial interpretation on ascertainment of foreign law.

China Updates Regulation for State Secrets Law

In June 2024, China revised the implementing regulation for its State Secrets Law, enhancing classification procedures, personnel confidentiality management, and secrecy inspection standards.

Chinese Court Refuses to Recognize Russian Judgment Due to Due Process

In 2020, a local Chinese court in Beijing ruled against the recognition and enforcement of a Russian monetary judgment on the grounds that the party in absentia had not been properly summoned (the case of Chepetsky Mechanical Plant Joint-Stock Company (2020) Jing 04 Xie Wai Ren No. 2).

China's New Company Law: Enforcing Paid-in Capital Rules

China's revised Company Law introduces a paid-in capital system, requiring shareholders to fully contribute their subscribed capital within five years, with a three-year transition period for existing companies to adjust their capital contributions.

China Issues Regulation on Rare Earth Administration

In April 2024, China introduced its first comprehensive regulation on rare earth management, addressing production, circulation, and reserves to ensure a regulated market and sustainable industry development.

China Revises Frontier Health and Quarantine Law

In June 2024, China revised its Frontier Health and Quarantine Law (国境卫生检疫法) to enhance measures against infectious disease transmission, including new quarantine protocols and medical priority for affected individuals.

SPC Releases Typical Cases of Financial Fraud

In June 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released five typical cases of financial fraud, aiming to strengthen the punishment of financial fraud, protect the legitimate rights and interests of investors, and promote the sound development of the industry.

China Issues New Regulations to Combat Cyber Violence

In June 2024, China's Cyberspace Administration, along with several ministries, issued new regulations to strengthen the governance of cyber violence, focusing on content management, user protection, and legal accountability.