China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Sets Standards for Punitive Damages in Food Safety

Thu, 31 Oct 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 21 Aug. 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued the “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Cases Involving Disputes over Punitive Damages for Food and Drugs” (关于审理食品药品惩罚性赔偿纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释, hereinafter the “Interpretation”), along with a series of typical cases on punitive damages for food safety violations with the aim of unifying judicial standards, protecting consumers’ rights and interests, and maintaining the order of production and operation.

The Interpretation consists of 19 articles, which clearly take “the extent of reasonable consumer needs” as the element in the assessment of punitive damages, and support the claims for punitive damages by consumers who knowingly purchase substandard products within this scope. The Interpretation also addresses issues such as the liability of intermediaries, small food production and processing workshops, and defects in labeling and instructions.

The highlights of the Interpretation are as follows:

  • Where a buyer knows that the food brought in does not meet food safety standards, and claims punitive damages of ten times the purchase price from the producer or distributor under the Food Safety Law, the court shall uphold the buyer’s claim in accordance with the law to the extent of reasonable consumer needs. The court may determine the amount of food that the buyer needs as a reasonable consumer based on factors such as shelf life and the ordinary consumption habits of an ordinary consumer.
  • If the producer or distributor alleges that the buyer knowingly purchased food that does not meet food safety standards, such producer or distributer shall provide evidence to support this allegation.

 

 

Photo by Federico Mata on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Chinese Supreme Court Judgment Enforced by Court of NSW Australia

In October 2024, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia ruled to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment (Fujian Rongtaiyuan Industrial Co Ltd v Zhan [2024] NSWSC 1318). The Chinese judgment was made by the Fujian High People’s Court, which was affirmed by a judgment of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) in 2021.

China Enacts Preschool Education Law

Effective June 1, 2025, China's newly passed Preschool Education Law emphasizes inclusivity and government-led development, and prohibits primary school-style teaching in kindergartens to promote the well-being and development of preschool children.

China Revises Cultural Relics Protection Law

China's revised Cultural Relics Protection Law, effective March 1, 2025, strengthens preservation measures, introduces pre-construction surveys, and promotes international cooperation in the restitution and return of cultural relics.

SPC Regulates Online Judicial Auctions

In November 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued new guidelines to regulate online judicial auctions, emphasizing transparency in property disclosures, enhanced mechanisms for judgment debtors to self-dispose of auctioned assets, and improved supervision across all auction stages to protect parties' rights and streamline enforcement procedures.

China’s First Tribunal-Ordered Interim Measure Issued in Beijing

In October 2024, an arbitral tribunal at the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC/BIAC) issued an interim measure based on the applicant’s request, which was later confirmed and enforced by the court through a preservation order. This is the first of its kind in China, confirming the validity of tribunal-issued interim measures and highlighting the pro-arbitration stance of Chinese courts.

SPC Releases IP Protection Cases in Seed Industry

In October 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released key judicial protection cases to strengthen intellectual property rights in the seed industry, focusing on plant variety and breeding material disputes.