China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

What Should I Do to Enforce a Default Judgment in China?|Service of Process and Foreign Judgment Enforcement Series (6)-CTD 101 Series

Thu, 27 Apr 2023
Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌
Editor: C. J. Observer

First thing first, please make sure the default judgment is properly served upon the defendant in China.

This post was first published in CJO GLOBAL, which is committed to providing consulting services in China-related cross-border trade risk management and debt collection. We will explain how debt collection works in China below.

Proper service of process is vital for foreign judgment enforcement in China. In this context, not only court summons but also court judgments require proper service to litigants in China.

Under Chinese laws, it is invalid to serve foreign judgments by mail/e-mail/fax to litigants in China. Such service will be regarded as a procedural defect, resulting in a substantial obstacle for applications of enforcing foreign judgments in China. More cases can be found in an earlier post ‘Do Foreign Judgments Need to be Served to Litigants in China?’.

Only upon the proper service of a default judgment and its entry into force, can the applicant make an application to enforce the judgment in China.

Please also note that in some cases, the entry into force of a default judgment may be assessed by considering the effect of Art. 16 of the Hague Service Convention, which allows a defendant who has not appeared, and against whom a default judgment has been entered, an opportunity to the forum judge for relief from the time-bar arising out of the expiry of the period for appeal. As China is a Contracting State of the Hague Service Convention and declared the applicability of the third paragraph of Art. 16, ‘the application for relief from the effects of the expiration of the time for appeal shall not be entertained except that it is filed within one year following the date of the judgment’.

 

 

* * *

Do you need support in cross-border trade and debt collection?

CJO Global's team can provide you with China-related cross-border trade risk management and debt collection services, including: 
(1) Trade Dispute Resolution
(2) Debt Collection
(3) Judgments and Awards Collection
(4) Bankruptcy & Restructuring
(5) Company Verification and Due Diligence
(6) Trade Contract Drafting and Review

If you need our services, or if you wish to share your story, you can contact our Client Manager Susan Li (susan.li@yuanddu.com).

If you want to know more about CJO Global, please click here.

If you want to know more about CJO Global services, please click here.

If you wish to read more CJO Global posts, please click here.

 

 

Photo by Hanny Naibaho on Unsplash

 

 

Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

Save as PDF

You might also like

Thus Spoke Chinese Judges on Cross-border Service of Process: Insights from Chinese Supreme Court Justices on 2023 Civil Procedure Law Amendment (2)

The 2023 Civil Procedure Law adopts a problem-oriented approach, addressing difficulties in the service of process for foreign-related cases by expanding channels and shortening the service by publication period to 60 days for non-domiciled parties, reflecting a broader initiative to enhance efficiency and adapt legal procedures to the complexities of international litigation.

China’s Wenzhou Court Recognizes a Singapore Monetary Judgment

In 2022, a local Chinese court in Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, ruled to recognize and enforce a monetary judgment made by the Singapore State Courts, as highlighted in one of the typical cases related to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) recently released by China’s Supreme People’s Court (Shuang Lin Construction Pte. Ltd. v. Pan (2022) Zhe 03 Xie Wai Ren No.4).

SPC Issues Judicial Interpretation on Ascertainment of Foreign Law

In December 2023, China’s Supreme People’s Court issued a judicial interpretation on the ascertainment of foreign law, providing comprehensive rules and procedures for Chinese courts, aiming to address difficulties faced in foreign-related trials and improve efficiency.