Dr. Liu Qiang is currently a editor at People's Court Daily and a postdoctoral fellow at China Institute of Applied Jurisprudence(应用法学研究所) under China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC).
He is also Ph.D.of China University of Political Science and Law, and visiting scholar at UC Davis.
Sun, 11 Jul 2021 Insights Guodong Du 杜国栋 , Liu Qiang 刘强
In October 2020, a court in Shenzhen, China, issued a decision in Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Co Ltd v. Sharp Corp. (2020), confirming that it had jurisdiction to set global royalty rates for related patents.
Sun, 27 Jun 2021 Insights Guodong Du 杜国栋 , Liu Qiang 刘强
Yes, answers a local court in Beijing in Liang v. Huifa Zhengxin Technology Co., Ltd. (2021), determining that publication and reproduction of the judgment containing the litigants’ names and facts are not considered a violation of privacy.
Sun, 20 Jun 2021 Insights Guodong Du 杜国栋 , Liu Qiang 刘强
In September 2020, a conduct preservation order as equivalent to anti-suit injunctions was issued by a Shenzhen court in ZTE v. Conversant (2018), restraining Conversant from applying to the German court to enforce the German judgment.
Sat, 19 Jun 2021 Insights Guodong Du 杜国栋 , Liu Qiang 刘强
Yes, Peppa Pig is a well-known trademark in China and enjoys cross-category protection, says a Shanghai court in the case of Entertainment One UK Limited (2019).
Sun, 13 Jun 2021 Insights Guodong Du 杜国栋 , Liu Qiang 刘强
To Obey, Or Not to Obey? A Chinese court skilfully stated that it did not consider unrecognized foreign injunctions in the case of Shenzhen Hongshang Leather Products Co. Ltd. (2017).
Sun, 06 Jun 2021 Insights Guodong Du 杜国栋 , Liu Qiang 刘强
Foreign investors can request the court to confirm their shareholder status, as shown in Carson Junping Cheng v. Shanghai Niuxinda Import & Export Co., Ltd.(2020), addressing a typical need after China’s Foreign Investment Law lifts certain restrictions.
Sun, 23 May 2021 Insights Guodong Du 杜国栋 , Liu Qiang 刘强
The damages of more than USD 20 million indicate the Chinese court's determination to strengthen judicial protection for IP rights.
Sun, 16 May 2021 Insights Guodong Du 杜国栋 , Liu Qiang 刘强
"No", answers a Shenzhen court in Gao v. Shenzhen Yunsilu Innovation Development Fund Enterprise (2018), ruling to set aside an arbitral award on the ground of public policy, given that cryptocurrency exchanges are banned in China.
Sat, 08 May 2021 Insights Guodong Du 杜国栋 , Liu Qiang 刘强
Bitcoin is protected as a virtual asset under Chinese law, but shall not be deemed as currency or financial product, as a Shanghai court decided in Li et. al. v. Yan et. al. (2019).
Sun, 02 May 2021 Insights Guodong Du 杜国栋 , Liu Qiang 刘强
The collection of personal information should be lawful, justified and necessary, as a principle upheld by Chinese courts in Guo v. Hangzhou Safari Park (2020).