Sun, 29 Nov 2020 Insights Guodong Du 杜国栋 , Meng Yu 余萌
China's Guiding Cases are different from case law, and in essence, belong to statutory law.
Insight: China Justice 中国司法洞察
Sun, 29 Nov 2020 Insights Meng Yu 余萌
In Jan. 2018, a Chinese local court accepted a case on recognition and enforcement of a Kenyan judgment, but the applicant withdrew the application afterwards.
Sun, 22 Nov 2020 Insights Meng Yu 余萌
A recent survey of a Chinese local court shows how Chinese courts hear cases concerning the recognition and enforcement of foreign divorce judgments.
Sun, 22 Nov 2020 Insights CJO Staff Contributors Team
Yes, photographs taken automatically from hot-air balloons can be copyrighted under Chinese law, just like those created by human beings, as indicated in a Chinese court ruling in April 2020.
Sun, 15 Nov 2020 Insights Guodong Du 杜国栋 , Meng Yu 余萌
Guiding Case System and Similar Case Retrieval System are established to unify the application of law and restrict the discretion of judges.
Sun, 15 Nov 2020 Insights Meng Yu 余萌
In March 2019, Xiangyang Intermediate People's Court, Hubei Province, rendered a ruling to recognize the damages awarded by a Polish criminal judgment in Santint Poland Sp. zo.o.v. Zhang pawuleikedan.
Sat, 07 Nov 2020 Insights Guiqiang LIU 刘桂强
When it comes to the stage of recognition and enforcement, limitation period is a decisive factor but can be easily ignored by the winning parties.
Sat, 07 Nov 2020 Insights Guodong Du 杜国栋 , Meng Yu 余萌
For Chinese judges, discovering similar cases is an unfamiliar and challenging task. However, the Guiding Case System(指导性案例制度) and the Similar Case Retrieving System(类案检索制度) established respectively in 2010 and 2020 have required them to face up to this task.
Fri, 30 Oct 2020 Insights CJO Staff Contributors Team
Yes, AI-created works can be copyrighted in China, as a local court in Shenzhen ruled recently in Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co., Ltd (2019).
Sun, 25 Oct 2020 Insights Guodong Du 杜国栋 , Meng Yu 余萌
China refused to recognize and enforce two Uzbekistan judgments in 2011 and 2014 respectively, all because of the service of process inconsistent with the bilateral judicial assistance treaty.